And if there is, what are the implications of this?
An "off-label" drug is one that is effective for other purposes than the one the FDA has formally approved of. Practising physicians frequently use off label drugs that have been shown over the years to be effective for a variety of conditions.
These drugs are also frequently beyond the years protected by patents, and are cheap, and widely available. In this particular instance there is an off-patent off-label drug that has been shown to be extremely safe in widespread use around the globe, that was also awarded a Nobel Prize for medicine when introduced some 4 decades ago.
This drug has more recently been shown to be highly effective in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19. There are now some 600 studies from around the world showing this. However, for some reason, information about this has been censored from public media.
The conversation linked below is between two scientists looking at the implications of suppressing an inexpensive and effective alternative to the emergency use mRNA vaccines.
Before we get to that however, another very highly regarded public health scientist and practising physician featured a few times in this blog previously, Dr. Peter McCullough, has said early treatment with this drug in question, in the context of a drug and nutraceutical "cocktail" approach, could have prevented 85% of the mortality of Covid-19. If that is correct 600,000 deaths in the US could have been 90,000.
And that raises a very disturbing question: would an entire industry, in conjunction with government, have blocked an efficient and effective alternative to the prevention and treatment of Covid-19? It's almost unthinkable that could be the case.
It would have required massive censorship to accomplish. Could that have been the reason we've had all this censorship, with doctors losing their license to practise? The evidence for it does seem to be piling up.
Here's that conversation:
No comments:
Post a Comment