These honorable people of the Canadian Covid Vaccine Inquiry were severely damaged by the pharmacological industries. Even if we give pharma the most generous motive possible...excitement to be introducing a major breakthrough in the prevention and death of disease, this so called vaccine turned out to be a disaster. Why they were apparently so sure a novel genetic manipulation that was not thoroughly tested was going to be safe is a conundrum of gargantuan proportions. Perhaps it was the whiff of huge profits and Nobel Prizes that did the trick. We cannot help but being disgusted.
This inquiry was 4 days long, and only concluded recently. I'm not sure how many of these testimonies are being put online, those I've seen are compelling.
In the pandemic it seemed obvious fairly early on that Big Pharma was running the show for two explicit reasons: one, profit, and two, censorship of the medical scientists and clinical MDs who put ethecs ahead of profit, and were not in the pocket of Big P.
It's a bit odd that so many were taken in, but Big Pharma does own broadcast media, and the script handed down from on high was basically a pack of lies. I say basically because obviously Big P is smoking their own dope, collectively the most profitable industry in the world, and continues to remain blind to their own radically unethical biases.
Stop and think for a moment: the reason the US is the least healthy post industrial country in the world is for one reason exclusively, and that reason is pharmacology.
Well, perhaps that blind is beginning to be torn off. This is, after all, the biggest scandal in US history.
Meanwhile the Senate's inquiry into how Big P repressed the truth in a variety of ways is qute interesting, this particular video clip being one of them.
Which raises a question: why is it that just because we have decoded the human genome we automatically assume it's modification is a good idea? It may be a bit too soon to say this definitively, but it sounds to me like one of the least intelligent ideas imaginable.
This post will be a follow-up to my previous post on April 12 titled mRNA and Cancer. In this current post the primary author of that paper has published a subsequent paper tilted "Censorship in Science", where he speaks to the difficulty of getting that paper published. And then it becomes obvious the extreme difficulty every author has faced getting legitimate research on the dangers of mRNA "vaccines" published is so extreme that we the public have seen none of this research.
The word "vaccines" are in parenthesis because we should not be so easily taken in by the conflation of the term "mRNA" with the word "vaccine".
Vaccines are not supposed to be dangerous.
And so then one wonders whether we should ever trust any part of the medical establishment again. I have expressed my opinion previously that surgery, if needed, is the best part of modern medicine, and that the current state of pharmacology is by and large a scam of huge proportions, turning, as it does, on the idea diseases caused primarily by poor nutrition can be "fixed" with drugs.
And so it may also be true many family doctors will have little to no knowledge of the large body of legitimate studies showing the dangers of attempting the genetic modification of any part of our biology because those studies have not been published.
Biological evolution is gradual for a reason.
And so... here is the video where the original author speaks to the impossibility of getting this research published in ANY high impact journal, and the extreme difficulty of getting it placed even in a low impact/low readership journal:
