The drip drip drip of Truth continues

The esteemed British cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra has testified before the Helsinki (Finland) court regarding his findings on the health dangers of mRNA technology. In a landmark international case the Finnish government is being sued for human rights violations for introducing a covid pass, and Malhotra and others were called to testify.

The audio recording of his testimony can be heard on Dr John Campbell's channel at the link below, and is important to hear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvGCtM25fN0

To understand how deep and wide "health care" corruption reaches, consider: the "payoff" extends well beyond "prestigious" medical journals, well beyond medical schools that are not teaching the actual cause of health, and into the world's largest and most powerful governmental "regulatory" health agencies, and into the elections in the parliamentary and congressional halls of some of the largest countries.

The problem has become so pervasive and vast it is almost too big to see. How the developed world fell into a hole this deep is very nearly incomprehensible. Unfortunately it is taking an outsized disaster to wake the world up.

And there is yet another danger as big (or bigger) than health care corruption: the grotesquely outsized revenue streams based on increasing profit from increasing sickness may be deemed more critically important than freedom and democracy.

How about that for a double whammy of sickness?

Do we hear Malthus knocking on the door?

The world is at an historically critical stage in more ways than one.

The Trickle of Truth

Dr John Campbell looks at a paper considering the causes of Long Covid published by the Australian Journal of General Practitioners. Campbell's look at this paper is informative in a variety of ways.

He mentions for example there is an effort in the US to declare Long Covid a national emergency (found at this URL)

https://actionnetwork.org/letters/help-end-the-long-covid-crisis

Another paper titled The Costs of Long Covid, published in the forum of the American Medical Association:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2792505

And Campbell's look at the Australian Journal of General Practitioners paper:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_6Z8DLvJw0

The answer to the question raised by the paper as to whether the primary trigger of long covid is the infection itself, or the mRNA, or both equally, is, I think, self-evident. Why? The effect of the infection itself on the non jabbed young and healthy with robust immune systems was barely noticed in that cohort, whereas the the young and healthy who did get mRNA'd came down with a variety of symptoms, including some that were fatal.

Moderna mRNA vaccines have caused a spinal cord injury called Longitudinally Extensive Transverse Myelitis

Vaccine injuries are profuse, and still being covered up by our government, who are protecting the pharma industry...a massive revenue stream that is deemed essential to the US economy.

Which is a bizarre variation of something I've said more than once in this blog...that we've become a country who's economic health is dependent on a sick population. And although I have no statistics at had to confirm this, I believe this particular situation is also a primary contributor to the huge wealth gap that has developed over the past decade or so, and currently at historic extremes.

Here's one story of a spinal cord injury called Longitudinally Extensive Transverse Myelitis, and the suffering this woman has gone through as a result.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/moderna-mrna-induced-longitudinally?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=71w24

Leading oncologist Angus Dalgleish calls for an immediate and permanent ban of mRNA vax technology

 I'd like to start this blog with a few notes below on Dr Dalgleish's eminence as a physician/researcher, particularly in the fields of cancer, immunology, and vaccine research and development:

-----------------------------------------------

Professor Angus Dalgleish is a leading cancer specialist and the Foundation Professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London. He is also the Principal of the Institute for Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy. His clinical interests include cancer immunotherapy, especially as applied to melanoma, prostate, pancreatic, gliomas, and other solid tumor types.

Dalgleish has made seminal observations relating to the virology of HIV, including identifying CD4 as a major receptive for HIV in humans, producing the first report of a link between Slim Disease in Africa and HIV infection, and identifying the close correlation between the immune response and the presence of tropical spastic paraparesis in patients infected with the HTLV-1 virus.

Dalgleish is a Fellow of The Royal College of Physicians of the UK and Australia, Royal College of Pathologists, and The Academy of Medical Scientists. His current research focuses on improving the response to IMM-101, which he now calls an immune modulator. He is also interested in combining immune modulators and immune therapy with other modalities.

-------------------------------------------

So why then is a prominent physician researcher of his eminence and accomplishment calling for an immediate and permanent ban of mRNA vaccine technology? It has to do with a very unusual rise in the all cause death rate that is way above normal in western countries.

Dr Dalgleish has published this article:

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/10/01/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/

But Dalgleish is not alone in seeing this. The life insurance industry was perhaps the first body that noticed the rate well above normal. The CDC has published these numbers, but the British CDC equivalent has recently altered how their data is published to reflect better optics perhaps. Perhaps the CDC will do so as well, we'll see.

An American statistician has studied this phenomenon and is speaking out about it:

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/cancer-deaths-spiked-in-2021-and?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-1a3e0b09-33bc-4816-b285-cae3142a8bd1

Dr John Campbell has been in conversation with Dr Dalgleish, here are some of Dr Campbell's preliminary remarks in this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxBz-jHDy_w

To Live Past 100, Valter Longo, longevity researcher

Interesting article on the longevity researcher Valter Longo in the NYT. It appears not to be behind a paywall

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/25/world/europe/italy-aging-valter-longo.html#:~:text=758-,To%20Live%20Past%20100%2C%20Mangia%20a%20Lot%20Less%3A%20Italian%20Expert's,and%20fish%20%E2%80%94%20and%20faux%20fasting.&text=Most%20members%20of%20the%20band,fast%2Ddie%2Dyoung%20lifestyle.

This jumped out at me:

using his diet to starve cells afflicted with cancer

Here is a summation to the fasting approach to treatment of diseases including cancer:

All cells including cancer cells need two things to grow, fuel and building blocks. Fuel comes from calories and building blocks come from protein. Except cancers need about 5x as much (or more) of both as normal cells, which is it's Achilles heel.

A water fast reduces both fuel and building blocks to a relative zero for the duration, and tumors actually shrink during that period.

During a water fast stored fats are converted to energy, the amount needed for survival but not heavy work. Meanwhile, as the fasting mechanism is engaged, body intelligence "assumes" disease or injury has arrested normal body functioning. In this period of extreme autophagy the body can and does reverse many conditions including some cancers. Some are more resistant however, but will still stop growing, and usually shrink for the duration.

The problem is how do we prevent the resumption of cancer growth as fuel and building blocks are reintroduced post fast.

What experts like Longo know is a reduction of fuel and/or certain proteins (methionine and leucine) is making differences. 

Longo also appeared on the Rich Roll Podcast recently, where a more complete understanding of the fasting approach to disease reversal and robust health will be possible:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06ROURlX6o4

Why was mRNA the Government Vaccine of Choice for COVID-19?

Dr Peter McCullough explains why mRNA was the Government Vaccine of Choice for COVID-19 at this link:

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/why-was-mrna-the-government-vaccine?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=71w24

Dr McCullough was stripped of at least two sources of income and one professorship for his contribution to the public conversation regarding the Covid-19 pandemic, and then later, the mRNA vaccine.

As he speaks about why mRNA technology was the vaccine of choice for Covid 19 it is not difficult to understand the overt censorship and punishment of contrary professional opinion regarding public protocols for the management of the Covid-19 pandemic.

When I say professional opinion I am speaking about a phenomenon that continues to be generally unknown by the public, which are the numbers of health care practitioners and researchers around the world in abject disagreement with all aspects of the public protocols that have been used for the management of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Many of these professionals were at the peak of their areas of specialty.

If draconian lockdowns and inadequately tested mRNA had proven out to the independent global scientific community perhaps we would not be seeing the uproar that is currently going on in that independent scientific community.

The key word here is "independent":  the pharma industry "owns" healthcare regulatory agencies, which have the power of stripping individuals of income and the licenses to practice. There has never been an instance in US history of the sort of bureaucratic fascism we witnessed, and are still witnessing. 

Fascism is a strong word. Why am I using it?

Public and private collaboration is normal, and economic benefit can and does occur. However where censorship and punishment is used in a combination of public and private economic power, there is fascism.

Fascia is a connective tissue that surrounds and stabilizes every part of the body. Fascism is the word coined by Mussolini to mean the inseparable connection of public and private economics. Fascism does not mean genocide, although fascists have certainly committed genocides.

Communism is not fascist, as there is no private sector in communism.

IMHO the greatest and most unique things about America's contribution to world history are the separation of church and state, and the separation of public and private economic sectors. That public / private separation has been gradually diminishing the past few decades, but the leap forward toward fascism during the pandemic is stunning and shocking.

Those are strong words, but I cannot think of any other way to say it.

Cancer Deaths Spiked in 2021 & 2022

And following the previous post here's additional information regarding the excess deaths in the developed western countries, in a video interview with a former Wall Street analyst Ed Dowd.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/cancer-deaths-spiked-in-2021-and?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-1a3e0b09-33bc-4816-b285-cae3142a8bd1

Dissension in the ranks...Let's not make the mistakes of the past

Drs John Campbell and Robert Clancy sitting down to discuss some of the issues to be addressed at an upcoming conference of the Australian Medical Association to be held in Sidney.

https://youtu.be/VnN6amvng-U?si=viA9G5TXosvktJiv&t=889

In addition the Australian Medical Association has published a book concerning the excess all cause mortality rate in Australia, available as a PDF download at no cost here:  https://amps.redunion.com.au/

This excess death rate is only occurring in developed west countries, and only began to occur after excess deaths from the virus itself had returned to pre-virus levels. Researchers from around the world are concerned, and the book the Australian Medical Association has published has articles contributed by some of them.

Response to a blog who's author is supportive of Harvard termination of Prof Martin Kulldorff

 I saw it was long and only now got around to reading it. At least this guy is a real doctor, not part of the mass hysteria crowd. I looked for evidence he is also a research scientist but didn't find it if it does exist. (Not spending too much time on it.) I did see he came across the Ioannidis seroprevalence study and was hesitant to argue against it as Ioannidis is one of the most published and cited epidemiologists in history.

The importance of this study (and other covid-19 seroprevalence studies) in the early days was to learn if the virus was risk stratified, and if so the percent of death according to risk stratification, and looking for the prevalence of antibodies across the entire population.

Covid-19 is/was very risk stratified, as is now clear, affecting mostly the elderly, whose immune systems are weaker for two reasons, age, and in addition poor lifestyle choices (which is more common in the US than any other developed world population).

The risk of death from infection was much lower in middle age, and a statistical zero in children under age about 14 (if I recall the exact age). So resistance to the virus is a smooth plot according to age and immune system strength.

On a side note "Immune System" is a bit of a misnomer, there is no specific anatomical system for immunity, the entire body is involved , to varying degrees.

What are the 12 systems of the human body?

They are Integumentary System, Skeletal System, Muscular System, Nervous System, Endocrine System, Cardiovascular System, Lymphatic System, Respiratory System, Digestive System, Urinary System, and Reproductive System (Female and Male). 

These seroprevalence studies, along with other established pandemic science, are the entire rationale for protecting the elderly, allowing children to stay in school, not giving vaccines to children under 12, and allowing the middle aged to continue work activities according to personal choice. 

There were no independent studies at that point for the safety and efficacy of the new mRNA tech, and none of the three authors of the GB Declaration have ever been "antivaxx" in any way.

Some call any resistance to any vaccine "antivaxx", a completely anti-science stance. Many vaccines in history have been withdrawn for safety reasons.  The only bodies saying vaccines are universally safe and effective are the profiteers. I'm surprised when rational people agree with that bias.

These studies also demonstrated the virus was spreading very quickly, much too quickly to stop in its tracks. It became clear then what we know now, basically every one has been exposed, and the majority to the point of symptoms. 

And standard epidemiological science is that viral pandemics are a natural disaster. We cannot stop volcanos, hurricanes, tsunamis, etc, and pandemics. We can however use science to reduce destructivity, with risk stratification etc.

Zero Covid was an invention of some marketing department, or at best, wishful thinking.

And the rationales for a total lock down and vaccines for everyone are an invention of BigP. The vaers vaccine injury system alone is sufficient evidence the roll out would have been stopped early in previous years on the basis of safety concerns. And now we have independent studies coming in from around the globe confirming significant safety issues.

The US Vaers reporting system (vaccine adverse event reporting system), and similar systems in nearly every country across the globe, suggest mRNA vaccine tech is quite dangerous relative to the commonly accepted standards for vaccine safety.

Finally a note about "studies" done by or for BigP (you've heard this before) are completely invalid on that one point alone - profit bias is "built in". Other biases are the participation of anyone involved with any kind of drug development invalidates studies. The only medical studies that can be trusted are completely independent. These are the only studies I pay attention to, and by that measure we've suffered ongoing censorship of medical information for at least a decade prior to the pandemic.

A lot of people that do follow independent studies re the pandemic are saying this has been a crime against humanity. In my opinion it has not risen to that level, but censorship of real scientific debate, censorship of information, ignoring basic epidemiological science, and mandates enforced by loss of livelihood, approach that level. What remains to be seen is the sum result of independent studies of vaccine related injury/death rates, and those studies are being done, but not by the pharma industry...no surprise there. 

Meanwhile what happened during the pandemic is potentially still happening...the all cause mortality rates across most of the globe in 2022 and 2023 are off the chart, while deaths from covid ave fallen to an effective nil. In the developed west (where BigP is in control of legislative bodies) there is massive resistance to looking into this issue.
Meanwhile my point of view is not a rush to judgement, and patience.

I will also say I do not understand why all things pandemic were politicized liberal and conservative. That to me says neither side should be listened to. 

Let's continue to listen to independent research scientists. 

Fortunately full censorship of the global internet is as yet not possible.

De Niro isn't afraid of Trump

I think most people do not understand what it means to be a pathological malignant narcissist, but Robert De Niro clearly does!

https://youtu.be/ZnQXC4_h-LM?si=s584Ayw3iEaPZwCX&t=174

Exactly how rare is the occurrence of biology in the universe?

First, did you ever stop and think where the term universe came from? Uni = one; verse = song; universe = one song. 

We don't know thats true! It's a metaphysical term, ie "spiritual", and has nothing to do with science as we think of science in our hypertech ultramodern world of today.

So why are we still using the term Universe? Can't we up the game a bit with a science word? 

The problem is we don't know "scientifically" if there is one verse. There might be two, or three or an infinite number of them.

Ah, I get it, if there's an infinite number of them, all of them would be one thing, all the songs. A body of songs.

Humm, back to metaphysics again, and metaphysics is a branch of philosophy, and definitely not the cold hard facts of science!! Maybe Einstein (definitely a scientist) had it figured out: “There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle.”

Shit. Now we're falling deeper into the quagmire of infinity (whatever that is). Does that mean we have to be either atheist or religious? What if I want to be both?

Humm, I guess that would be pantheistic agnosticism. Which I guess translates roughly to "I know there is life, but I can't really say I understand it completely".

How do I know? I don't know, I just know that I know we are definitely "here". It's a feeling.

Perhaps the word science isn't really "grounded" unless we can turn a specific scientific principle into a technology. Like Einstein: e=mc2, et voila, nuclear energy.

That word bugs me, sounds a bit like "new clear", doesn't it?

Which brings us back to biology, ie life, and the question: how rare is it...?

Or how common? How common is biology in the universe?

Obviously we have absolutely no idea. We at least know there is one example, and we are it, living, as we are, in the "known" universe.

So there is at least one, and I think it's likely if there's one there's more. But since there is only one in the "known" universe, and since that's a relatively big space, it is rare.

So "biology is rare" is a ground plane of understanding. Let's look further at why it is relatively rare.

How far is the earth from the sun? 92 million miles. How far is the equator to the poles? 6000 miles. Apparently the "star to planet ratio" is pretty exact since none of the other planets in "our" solar system (yes we own it:) have biological life. Why not?

The star to planet ratio has to do with strength of radiation, heat and light, and very likely other forms of radiation also. The heat and illumination ratio has to be pretty damn exact...and how do we know that?

Well, think about the distance of the earth to the sun, 92 million miles. Now think about the distance of the equator to the poles, 6 thousand miles. Now think about the fact the proliferation of species of biology on the equator is VASTLY (some unknown orders of magnitude) greater than the the proliferation of biology on the poles. In a measly 6000 miles is the difference between almost too hot to almost too cold for biology to exist. And 6000 compared to 92 million? Relative to that number, if the earth was just a tiny bit further or closer to the sun biology would not exist, it would be too cold or too hot.

No wonder Earth is the only planet in nine where the extremely rare miracle of biology occured.

And how is it the earth hit that exact sweet spot? What are the oods?

You'd think we would be more careful with that rare miracle, right? 

We already know there are enough nukes on the planet to destroy most of the biology on the planet (including us), and now we are worried artificial intelligence has the potential (according to the brainiacs who invented it) to end the human species!

Double trouble.

So why in the name of creation are we disrupting the ecology with man made technology to the point the so-called 6th mass extinction has begun?

I'll give you the short version, and it's something we humans really don't like admitting to ourselves. We are "driven" mostly by the unconscious (instinctual) mind, not the rational "conscious" mind. But not only that, the "processing" of the unconscious mind (brain, brain stem, and nervous system) takes up about 10x more space in the entire "autonomic nervous system" than the conscious mind's processing does.

Which makes us closer to the "lower animals" than we like to admit.

You know the one "we only use about 10% of our brain"? Well that's what it is referring to. And the incredible thing is that it takes up so much "room", and yet we are completely unconscious of it.

So the unconscious drive behavior that probably gets us in more trouble than the others is greed. Buddhists have a solution for that! But how many of us are Buddhists...

That aside, the better we personally become with loving behavior, the more likely we will individually become a net positive in our "impact" on the planet and all of our brothers and sisters across the planet.

Will that save our species? Who knows, but one thing is for certain, it just feels better living that way, and that is reason enough.

Dietary Heart Disease, Damage to Arterial Endothelial, Rubbery Plaque Formation, and Spike Protein Damage to Endothelial

We know from dietary heart disease that damage to the endothelial generates a rubbery plaque to form on arterial walls as a defense of some kind. And we now know the mRNA vaxxes generate massive spike proteins cascading through the arterial and vascular systems, damaging the endothelial, and generating similar rubbery plaques as occurs in dietary heart disease.

If nothing else this vaxx disaster shines a bright light on the cause of premature death in the majority of developed world populations, which could be a positive for population health.

That is unless the pharma industry manages to cover up this connection due to the damage it would cause to their business model.

There is a well documented sordid history of this sort of cover up. But wouldn't it be nice if the most prescribed drug, statins, becomes the least prescribed drug because it isn't needed any longer, and developed world healthy life spans were extended by decades.

AI, Friend or Foe?

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfcyq7uGbZg

It mispronounced sentient! A programmer's easter egg?

Sentient definition:

Sentient means capable of sensing or feeling. It can also mean conscious of or responsive to sensations like seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting, or smelling. For example, "Elephants are highly intelligent, sentient and responsive creatures".

Sentience surfaces only in self generating life, ie biology. 

Sentience definition:

The capacity to experience feelings and sensations, to have affective consciousness, subjective states that have a positive or negative valence (Chandroo et al., 2004). From: Neuroscience, 2022.

How do seeds know how and when to sprout? This can be argued to be among the most basic forms of sentience.

Life, ie biology, is some unknown orders of magnitude more complex than AI, and any other form of technology.

Can AI be made into a weapon? Of course. Any technology can be made into weapon. 

Technology does not have feelings, intuition, instincts, "drive", or an unconscious mind.

It does not want anything.

The danger is not AI, it is "drive", Eros and Thanatos:

In Greek mythology, Eros is the god of love and desire, while Thanatos is the personification of death. Eros represents the life instinct, which drives behaviors that promote survival, pleasure, and reproduction. Thanatos, on the other hand, represents the death instinct, which drives aggressive and destructive behaviors. 

While Eros is associated with creativity, love, and relationships, Thanatos is associated with aggression, self-destructive tendencies, and the desire for death or non-existence. Freud borrowed these terms from Greek mythology to conceptualize two fundamental drives within the human psyche in constant conflict, shaping human behavior and psychological development.

In other words, as POGO said, we have met the enemy and he is us.

As we get smarter do the odds we will self-destruct grow? If so, why would we call it smarter?

Wanna know a bit more about a certain presidential candidate? Watch this.

And without further ado:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTkKXDvSJvo

Are we humans not as smart as we think we are?

A brief comment on this potential problem for us to ponder:

Humans being not as smart as we think we are is a huge issue.

Look, we are not trans-biological, we are an animal species with a certain brain size, and a corresponding limited intelligence. I would guess the smartest among us have an outstanding capacity to see this.

The "limitless capacity" optimists are in fact, and unconsciously, quite hubristic, and consequently, destructive. A primary consequence of this in the recent history of Sapiens is an incapacity to see the destructive aspects of industrialism and technology until we are well past the "oops" point.

Those too hubristic to see this can be quite dangerous. It's a form of narcissism that breeds all sorts of destructivity.

It is well to remember that technology will always be a double edged blade. The hope that we will solve the destructive aspects of previous technologies with "newer and better" technologies can only take us further from our biological (and healthy) foundation.

What does strength have to do with health and longevity?

Well, it turns out strength is the most highly correlated factor that we have control of  to health, longevity, and even cognitive performance. I suppose we might even say physical strength correlates strongly to mental and emotional strength.

And it trumps genetics, and by a lot.

How do we know this? To start with there was so much anecdotal evidence of this that researchers began doing studies on it. And at this point the body of research evidence for this is massive.

The topic of this blog is a scientist-researcher who also works directly with individuals:

Dr Andy Galpin, PhD, is Professor of Kinesiology (the study of movement) at California State University, Fullerton, and Co-Director of the Center for Sport Performance and Founder/Director of the Biochemistry and Molecular Exercise Physiology Laboratory.

In addition to this information being valuable to you personally, you may even find his story touching. Enjoy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQ78Hpwrt80&t=31s

Are we facing a new disease?

Embalmers around the world have noticed in the previous three years a profound difference in the deceased. As they prepare bodies for viewing the blood is replaced with embalming fluid consisting of formaldehyde and several other agents. This is done by injecting the embalming fluid into the carotid artery using a pump to displace the blood, which drains out of the body through the right jugular vein. Recently however the blood cannot be replaced with embalming fluid in about 20% of the bodies due to a near complete blockage caused by an arterial plaque never seen before. It takes the form of long rubbery cords that block the arteries almost completely. It can be removed however with forceps, as the composition of these plaques is quite strong.

The consensus in the medical community currently aware of this is it's a completely new pathology. The very odd thing is it is (apparently) not being studied, and nothing has appeared yet in the medical literature.

However, as mentioned, general knowledge of this has surfaced with embalmers, which can be seen here in several interviews:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z06xBRCwGp0&t=10s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rAoqhTUU0g

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwdRfbPrGIY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLl69c46JK0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-o20mtbsL7Q&t=12s

And a brief discussion on this topic between Dr John Campbell and Neil Oliver, a Scottish television presenter and author:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1wj0JJ0yDw

A certain perspective on whole foods vs processed foods

I'd like to suggest a certain perspective when thinking about whole foods. It's helpful to folks who are learning the importance of whole food nutrition to distinguish good carbohydrates from bad carbohydrates, because carbs are frequently spoken of as if they are only bad.

This is the fault of the greedy bastards who want to keep us confused about nutrition so that they can continue to take advantage of us, and keep selling us crap, so that BigP can also continue taking advantage of us by putting us on drugs that make us worse not better. And then of course prescribe another drug (or two) for that.

Whole food carbs (fruits and vegetables) are of course good, and delicious.

Fresh whole apples are of course good, a baked apple pie with refined sugar, refined fat, and refined flour is in fact unhealthy, being toxic, addictive, and if those two are not bad enough, also full of empty calories.

We need only so many calories, don't waste the chance of getting them in their most potent form by eating only whole fresh foods.

We have this idea our grandparents ate healthy and were healthy. Compared to current generations there's a grain of truth there. But one of my grandmothers (who I loved dearly) was a great cook, but overweight, and also smoked and drank. This was not unusual in those days, the 1950's. It is still not unusual, but compounded now by fast foods which are also toxic.

Whole food carbs are naturally delicious and full of micro nutrients (vitamins and minerals).

To take it a step further, it is actually incorrect to call processed foods carbohydrates at all, they are more accurately called toxic food-like substances. Perhaps that's belaboring the point, but it is at least instructive.

None of the three macro nutrients carbs, fats, and proteins, in whole food form and essential to health, should be lumped in with junk food. It is fact an incorrect use of the term carbohydrates to say "bad carbs", or fats to say "bad fats".

The three macro nutrients are all essential and necessary for health. The more accurate term for the refined versions is "toxic food like substances".

We are healthiest when we consume 100% of our calories nested in whole food form.

I NEVER THOUGHT I'D ADMIT THIS PUBLICLY... Paul Thomas MD

Many MDs are having the same negative experience...they do not like their job, and if they were starting over, they would not go to medical school. 

Why? 

Well, they have learned what autophagy is (which is hard to avoid these days if one is interested in health to any significant degree). Autophagy is simply a fancy word for "the body heals itself" (when we stop putting toxins in it, and move with some significant degree of activity ).

And they've seen over and over that pharmacology (the only tool in their box) is worse than ineffective in the vast majority of cases. And they have seen over the years how the pharma industry has become an autocratic and corrupt dictator.

And now more and more of them hate their job...can you blame them? 

And the way the pandemic was handled turned a bright light on the exact ways this industry is broken.

Ever noticed how many hospitals there are these days? And childrens hospitals! The business model is broken, pharma needs more and more sick people for growth. 

Why are so many people on prescription medications for life?

Why is the US one of only two countries in the world that allows pharma ads in the mass media?

The medical system is completely broken, and the reason is a terribly corrupt and out of control pharma industry. Unfortunately it has become so profitable that pharma "owns" every corner of conventional medicine, and congress to boot.

Good luck getting congress off that pharma tit...

The number of MDs and nurses quitting their jobs is approaching avalanche proportions. 

Here is one doctors story, why, if he had to do it over again, he would have taken an alternate route to becoming a healer.

https://youtu.be/z2DkOjkWsGI?si=Ex2uiip8uNqEvGSm

The Death of Science - A New Dark Age

Dr John Campbell in conversation with Professor Angus Dalgleish, physician, oncologist, pathologist, medical researcher and author. Among other things the distinguished Dr. Dalgleish has written and published hundreds of research papers in prestigious medical journals, and is about as credentialed as a medical researcher can be.

Now he can't get published. 

I'm not sure it's apparent to the public that a "scientific establishment" that cannot allow all expert voices to be heard is not science, it is authoritarianism.

"As soon as free speech is ended, science also stops".

(Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, author of the Great Barrington Declaration.)

https://youtu.be/sz6zMZMDoO0?si=eWmJqJG1rGSLixhq

A thought experiment to help us know the difference between food and toxic substances

And it's pretty simple. Ask yourself "can I make a meal of this one thing"?

How would drinking a glass of deep fry grease make you feel? Your body would involuntarily vomit before you could down half of it.

This sort of thought experiment helps to identify toxic substances sneaking into our diets. We can tolerate the grease in a serving of french fries, but it is still toxic, and while it doesn't kill us immediately it does profoundly damage our health and vitality in subtle increments that go mostly unnoticed. 

Until they don't.

What about common table salt? The lethal dose in children is 4-5 teaspoons, and highly toxic to adults, whereas the sodium needs of humans are completely met by eating a balanced diet of whole plant foods.

A variation on the thought experiment: "could a child make a meal of that one thing"?

Food is the single substance "thing" we can make an entire meal of, with no discomfort. The size of a meal varies quite a bit person to person for a number of reasons, let's say for the purpose of discussion it's 1000 calories for an average adult.

Could you sit down to a meal of only table sugar? 1000 calories of table sugar is 60 teaspoons. Yep, involuntary  regurgitation, again.

You get the point. 

In addition we have just covered the reason an "SOS free" whole food diet translates to sugar, oil, and salt FREE. Yep, it's a thing.

When the opportunity to consume a non-toxic diet is as simple as the inclusion of only delicious non-toxic natural foods, why wouldn't we do it? 

Hunter gatherers did it because they had no choice. We can do it too, but for us it is a choice. The reasons we don't are primarily lack of awareness, and the greedy bastards who are taking advantage of our instinct structure by creating hyper-palatable substances and selling them cheap.

Calories are scarce in nature, which creates the condition of survival of the fittest, the instinct structure that still lives within us. When the "calories are scarce" instinct is presented with hyper-palatable food-like toxic substances, we are unconsciously driven to consume them. The "awareness" part referenced previously is primarily simply knowing this one thing.

There's a great book that covers this health destroying modern problem in greater detail titled "The Pleasure Trap". It's a vegan perspective, but the principles apply to any dietary perspective.

It's all about our health. What is it? In a word, vitality. It occurs simultaneously with a good mood and feeling energetic. It manifests as the ability to move the body with high levels of vigor, relative to age. For example, the potential to move the body at athletic levels relative to age continues to about the age of 80 in healthy and vital populations. There are even people in an outlier population running marathons at 90 and above. On the other hand healthy and vital to athletic levels at 80 is potentially achievable for most humans. 

What percent of modern US citizens achieve these levels of vitality into age 80 and above?

Help! I've fallen into the pleasure trap and I can't get out!

Yes you can... are you going to let the greedy billionaire bastards continue to get richer by preying on the unconscious instinct structure of humans, in the process destroying your nature given ability to be healthy happy and strong?

It is no exaggeration to say a great darkness has fallen across the land. Dispel it with the light of your own vitality!

Docu Film everyone should see - THEY’RE TRYING TO KILL US

It's a difficult watch for white, brown, or black. But it's a story that needs to be told, and EVERYONE benefits from watching it. It can be seen free of charge in the month of February at this Vimeo link:

https://vimeo.com/892946324?share=copy

And one has to wonder the role privileged white men play in this "soft" genocide:

Keeping certain populations uninformed?

Governmental revenues?

The hindrance of the development of a certain political class?

Fortunately citizens across the spectrum are waking up to levels and types of destructive corruptions plaguing our societies.

The most direct way to fight the corruption is a vote with your pocketbook. It's ultimately the only thing this government responds to.

Meanwhile it will continue delivering a massive spew of information thru mass media that is the exact opposite of truth.

And the fattest, most corrupt, and profitable lie of all? Pharmaceutical drugs are going to make us healthy.

Become informed. Stop buying the crap that is killing us.

People are waking up to where we are in time and place.

And that goes for all of us.

COVID Psychological Manipulation: Unpacked

Ros Nealon-Cook, a psychologist from Australia, had her license suspended for sounding the alarm about the harms to children from government pandemic policy.

Ros has joined forces with a number of health professionals from around the world who were similarly censored and silenced. Together they have created The Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration to raise awareness about widespread government propaganda and the censorship of expert scientific opinion.

She speaks of her experience in this conversation with Dr John Campbell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Iqa4CoMciU

mRNA tech - is DNA foreign to humans integrating into the human genome?

It seems like a reasonable thing to ask. The surgeon general of Florida is raising this issue, and is eloquent in how he presents it. Well worth a listen in the first few minutes of a longer video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYUKR7-NgTQ

The actual cause of obesity - Fat?

A channel called Plant Chompers has valuable information in an enjoyable context. Here we are talking about the primary cause of the obesity epidemic in the US.

https://youtu.be/GU7u-wuvOB8?si=DNd6Mjvs-SShreET

And I particularly enjoyed this comment below the video:

"It's pretty obvious fats are not hyper-palatable without the addition of salt or sugar or both. Single fats on their own are relatively tasteless. But they are hyper-caloric, and that allows eating smaller portions of food in a meal, another reason to call these meals "fast", gulping down 1000 cals in minutes. How long does it take to eat 1000 cals of whole fruits and veggies? Convenience is killing us! As "The Pleasure Trap" (book) points out our basic instincts are to avoid pain, seek pleasure, and conserve energy. Without responsible governance we are very easy to take advantage of. It's all about the GDP baby!"

Yeah, that was me lol  :)

Ordinary people are seeing through government lies and corruption

For many It will be a cognitive dissonance too far off the scale to fully process. In the developed west we've come to trust our governments. But it isn't too hard to understand how this happened. Well I shouldn't use the past tense, it's still happening.

It's basically a follow the money situation, but one outsized relative to the common forms of corruption we think of as business as usual.

It's also a situation where the self-reinforcing biases that form in centers of power become all encompassing so gradually over years and decades we don't really notice them fully until the ceiling collapses.

It is my feeling this will go down as the biggest scandal in US history.

It is reassuring however to know there will always be humans whose moral compass is strong enough they will not remain silent when ethics and morality are off the rails.

Such as Dr John Campbell, who two days ago asked: "what are these" ??

https://youtu.be/z06xBRCwGp0?si=XxkHBktu1psC_Y8x

In the quest to rid the world of the evil anti-vaxxers...

BigP seems to have has shot itself in the foot. No, wait, they seem to have blown it clean off. Quick, get those guys on some drugs right now.

A taste of their own medicine?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BhC0BCYQwo

You think you know how bad the pharma industry is? No, you really don't.

BTW I'm not a republican, but came across this and it hits the nail on the head, a former pharma guy talking about the negatives of ozempic for weight loss.

It's almost as if they come out with drugs deliberately designed to make you sick, so then they can put you on another drug.

Let's remember, the body heals itself with whole food nutrition, sleep, physical activity, and meaningful social connection.

Don't worry, not a Tucker Carlson fan either, and continue to find Trump to be a malignant pathological narcissist.

 But both parties have gone plumb crazy... 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzRjkNYT-U8

Red Flags Ignored

 Professor Angus Dalgleish, physician, oncologist, pathologist, medical researcher and author, has a few things to say about the booster program you may want to hear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFUE1VchVaE

A peculiar trait to unconsciously extrapolate a current trend to infinity

We humans have a peculiar trait to unconsciously extrapolate a current trend to infinity. But trends change. Here's MSOS as a potential example (click for bigger)

The downtrend may be reversing. How do we define an up trend... a series of higher lows and highs. Downtrends are a series of lower red and green bars and uptrends are a series of higher green and red bars. We do not have a higher high as of now, the current two peaks are the same level, and the danger is a "double top", and then a downtrend continuation, a fairly common pattern.

You may be wondering why I didn't send this as a text? Not enough room. Phones are a micro computer, useless for trend analysis.

How do trends manifest in life? Happy periods vs unhappy periods is the simplest way to say it. How do you know an emotional trend is changing? The transition of lower highs and lows to higher lows and highs. Which way are your lows going? The first thing that happens to indicate impending uptrend is they aren't getting lower. Then they begin getting higher.

It's a process that happens over time.

It's mechanically difficult to reverse an emotional downtrend when doing drugs alcohol and junk foods. Sorry, them's just the facts. Non toxic inputs (whole foods, exercise, good sleep) are so mechanically influential on emotional trends the rest is mostly automatic...it just happens.

It's all about the love baby.

BTW, I'll trade cannabis, but I won't consume it.

The #1 Cause Of Obesity, Diabetes & Illness Nobody Talks About | Robert Kennedy Jr & Mark Hyman

Dr Mark Hyman, a prominent whole foods based physician, is supporting Robert Kennedy Jr in the upcoming election. In the most succinct terms I can muster, this is what Kennedy and Hyman will be up against:

The NIH has not now, not ever, had an Institute of Nutrition among it's (current) 20 institutes dedicated to health.

Our bodies are self healing given good nutrition, and the powerful form of nutrition is whole fresh foods.

Drugs are not food. The idea we need drugs to be healthy is literally fraudulent, and the fraudsters are raking in more billions selling drugs than any industry in history.

On the whole, pharma and its major partner in crime the processed food industry, shorten lives significantly, whereas strong messaging to consume whole foods and reduce dependence on pharma drugs will extend healthy life spans dramatically.

Robert Kennedy Jr is talking about these things right out loud. I can't recall another politician who has done so.

But corruption this deep and wide is not easily shut down, and I am skeptical. At least acknowledging it publicly is something. It will be interesting to see how his willingness to confront one of the biggest issues of our time plays out as his campaign progresses.

Here is a recent conversation between Kennedy and Dr Mark Hyman:

https://youtu.be/rQedKOpJM-0?si=cmDsopG7sqZWURJY