Dr John Campbell has extensive experience in the care of dementia patients, and has just published a video on dementia awareness. It may only be a coincidence he did this after the Biden Trump debate. Be that as it may he does not mention any individual specifically.
But it is quite interesting and informative, and I would suggest we all have a special interest at this particular point in time, as Biden appeared on the debate stage to have developed dementia.
And as Campbell does note, this can be a dangerous condition not only for the victim, but also for others with proximal connections of some type.
The U.S. Army and National Guard acknowledged a soldier’s “debilitating heart condition” is connected to the COVID-19 vaccine, according to a new report by former CBS reporter Catherine Herridge.
Army National Guard Specialist Karoline Stancik, 24, has reportedly racked up over $70,000 in medical debt after being hospitalized for heart complications. She suffered her first heart attack after receiving the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.
An Army memo about Stancik’s situation acquired by Herridge shows she had been diagnosed with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, or "POTS." Stancik described having intense adverse reactions to her vaccinations, including high heart rate, neuropathic pain and difficulty breathing.
She was released from active duty in 2022, costing her medical benefits and a salary.
The effects she experienced were so detrimental to her health, Stancik said, that she considered suicide. She now requires a pacemaker and heart surgery.
Stancik is now being represented by USJAG, an advocacy organization for soldiers injured in the line of duty. Veterans Advocate Jeremy Sorenson told The National Desk (TND) the case represents a larger trend of removing benefits from injured troops as a cost-saving measure within the Department of Defense.
"Our country has a responsibility to take care of our injured service members," he added. "[Branches of the military] ignore the Department of Defense instructions, they ignore federal law and they make policies and they make determinations that are wholesale illegal."
An Army spokesperson reportedly told Herridge that Stancik could have remained on active duty while receiving treatment. She denied having ever been counseled about this option.
Neither the Pentagon nor Moderna responded to a request for comment from TND Monday.
The GOP side of the House Judiciary Committee applauded Herridge's return to journalism in a post on X Monday afternoon, claiming the "Left tried to silence" her. Herridge was laid off from CBS News in February.
Video interview with Karoline Stancik at the link below:
The debate between Trump and Biden was crystal clear evidence the US is in trouble. As if there was not evidence enough already.
You gotta wonder what's going on with Democrats who put Biden, who I basically like, but who clearly has dementia, on stage with mad man Trump.
It's the contest between the addled and the mad men.
I suppose the case can be made it doesn't matter since presidents have been figureheads since Bush Sr anyway, whose qualification for taking on the responsibility of head of state was running the CIA. We've been electing puppets since Bush Sr, and no one seems to be noticing.
Well, Trump is not a puppet, but there is a significant problem: he is personality disordered. The hundreds of mental health professionals who spoke out about this are 100% correct, a reality distortion field is the predominant force driving him.
So then who is running the show? In my opinion it's obvious, oligarchs and the intelligence agencies, including the two "new" ones, Homeland Security and the National Security Agency.
Meanwhile we sink ever deeply into authoritarian fascism. The US is in trouble and the answer is apparently going to be fascism.
Oh, and the pharma drugs that only make the population sicker.
The empire is crumbling. Well it happens to all empires sooner or later. Does inevitability make it OK?
Rich Roll has Dr Goldhamer on for a second time, the previous time was three years ago, and significant progress has been made in Dr Goldhamers work since!
I cannot recommend this conversation highly enough. Please enjoy.
At a recent Senate Homeland Security Committee hearing, Dr. Steven Quay explained why he thinks COVID-19 leaked from a lab in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and warned about current work being done there. Dr. Quay is a credentialed expert who is, in effect, blowing the whistle on what credentialed experts are saying amongst them selves, vs what they are saying in public. I find Dr. Quay credible, and what he has to say overdue, and necessary.
It seems some want to ignore the lab leak hypothesis. Granted, the implications, if true, are very uncomfortable.
Personally I'm intensely curious about it. The pandemic is after all among the most profound historical periods in US history.
And still not a peep about the lab leak hypothesis on main stream media? At least censorship of scientific debate on the internet did not completely work for the censors. Yea internet and freedom of speech.
Social media on the other hand was easy enough to do. But how many scientists engage in legitimate debate on Facebook anyway? After censorship was enabled real scientific debate was occurring online, but very few doob tubers and mass media "news" watchers were aware of that. In fact it wasn't difficult to find pandemic related debate online among legitimate epidemiologists. And the public is still generally unaware how much legitimate dissension there was, and continues to increase.
How did we get the idea censorship of legitimate debate between experts was a good idea to begin with? Vaccine hesitancy! But isn't hesitancy a good thing in many instances? We were witness to one of those instances quite recently in fact.
The fundamental reason for censorship is always an illogical narrative that must be protected due to vested interests. The protection narrative only takes root in the form of mythology. The vested interests, the "true believers", are mostly unconscious of the fact the constructed narrative is a mythology. And so, the battle royal ensues.
Mythology is an idea construction that is socially true but factually false. And vaccines have developed a mythological overlay.
We humans love our mythologies! And we keep inventing new ones. Myth busting is a primary reason science evolves. And a lot of what is called "science" is actually speculation.
Meanwhile it becomes evermore obvious the pharma industry has become so powerful as to manage narratives nearly completely about many things. And there is a strong mythological component in the pharma narrative.
Mythological? The reason pharmacology has distinctly mythological characteristics is that drugs are not the cause of health. They can save lives, but as a foundational platform for health drugs are a massive failure, which is increasingly visible in our pharma infused population.
What is the cause of health? The qualities existing in a nutrient rich diet and the discontinuation of putting toxic food-like substances in the mouth and swallowing...and clean air and water, sleep, exercise, and loving social connections, to name the basics.
None of which pharmacology has anything on offer. All they have is drugs with various side effects (which means all drugs are toxic to varying degrees).
And robust health equals robust immunity, which in the case of the covid-19 pandemic turned out to be much more effective than the experimental mRNA injections.
Meanwhile mythology has its fervent priests running the show. Apparently some things never change, even in our higher tech world of today.
This will be interesting, it is not a mandate, but it is mRNA technology, offered to the public over 60 as a reduction in risk from the RSV virus (Respiratory syncytial virus).
Dr McCullough has been like a dog on a bone regarding what he and hundreds of other MDs who have now gone on the record with their concerns about mRNA tech, and why. These vocal doctors consider mRNA technology to be "experimental" genetic modifications.
Meanwhile the pharmaceutical industry has been gearing up for this moment (beginning with Covid-19) since the cracking of the human genome. The goal is of course twofold: fighting disease, and profit. As anyone reading my blog knows, I have issues with the profit side of the equation, it's "weighting" in that equation (which would have to do with biases, both conscious and unconscious), and insufficient regard for risk in the people who receive these novel mRNA drugs.
