With no financial transparency as to who profits.
Well let's see, mRNA was an idea introduced by Robert Malone in 1987 when he was a PhD research assistant, and then awarded several patents for it. But research studies on animals has not, to the best of my knowledge, produced a working version since, and yet we were all induced to take it in response to Covid. And I don't see that they worked there either to stop transmission and infection. We were told by "vested parties" they reduced deaths, and we've seen how the information we've been given by these same parties is manipulated to create very false impressions of efficacy.
Pharmacology seems to be caught up in a "mania". Stock market bubbles are called manias aren't they. This "mania" has some overlap certainly in terms of the obscene profits that have been produced, but with an almost religious "health messaging" ferver layered on.
I don't know of a single autophagy oriented health professional of any stripe who thinks this approach is anything but a furtherance of pharmacologically induced health degradation in the general population.
Dr Campbell's perspective is, as usual, crystal clear and on target. Let's hear what he has to say:
Just curious ….how does he know the natural immunity is growing exponentially in China?
ReplyDeleteThe vaccine rate in China is low on a percent of population basis. An increase in infection induced by the lifting of lockdown will be followed by a resolution of infection in most cases, and the successful resolution induces immunity in that individual. It is an exponential function with the end of lockdown, as the virus is now free to spread quickly into a "dry tinder" population. Pandemics end at herd immunity, which can occur naturally (without vaccines), and theoretically also with vaccine induced immunity. I say theoretically for two reasons: one, mRNA did not induce immunity (and China wisely did not use mRNA anyway, as it is inadequately tested and understood), and two, pandemics always spread exponentially (very quickly), and by the time vaccines are developed, tested, and available herd immunity is well on the way to being established in the population. Vaccines typically take all the credit, but this is an unwarranted mistake of an "unconscious bias" held by the healthcare industry, which stands to garner accolades and profits.
ReplyDeleteAnd it should be further noted that the China lockdown proves what was already known in epidemiology: lockdowns ironically serve to extend a pandemic by delaying herd immunity. And the damage caused lockdown is multifold: delay of pandemic resolution, significant psychic stress in the population, and economic damage. Why lockdown was chosen in the current instance continues to be a bit of a mystery.
ReplyDelete