In the video linked below Steve Hanke of John Hopkins is one of three authors of a meta-analysis of the benefit to harm ratio of lockdowns during the pandemic. Hanke is a well known highly respected economist most publicly known perhaps as the US government's point man for quelling hyperinflations around the globe as they arise.
Hanke's wiki page is extensive, noting among other things he and another John Hopkins professor founded the Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health and Study of Business Enterprise.
We also see in the first section of the wiki page Hanke has been "accused" of spreading disinformation about the covid-10 pandemic.
Humm. Well I would love to see Hanke on an open forum debate stage with his accusers, but I'm pretty sure if invited they would not accept.
We've entered the upside down world of double speak where fascist propogandists accuse truth tellers of misinformation.
And the most disturbing thing about the way the pandemic was handled has made clear western governments are shifting toward fascism, and are now completely dependent on the massive revenues of big pharma, and subservient to big pharma. Now this wouldn't be so bad if BigP were at the very least a benign force, but as many have known for decades this is far from the case.
Perhaps the one good that has come out of the way the pandemic was handled is a much larger proportion of western populations have woken to the fact BigP has morphed into a large scale malevolence enforcing fascist controls on entire populations via their governmental and legislative puppets.
And the question that has to be asked: can we realistically do anything about it?
As we ponder that question let's listen and watch as Professor John Campbell steps us through the meta-analysis.
No comments:
Post a Comment