The excess death rate that is currently occurring around the world isn't news among epidemiologists around the world, but is not being mentioned in mainstream mass media. Epidemiologists have the statistical tools to filter out potential causes for excess death and have been working on it. Here is Dr. John Campbell in one of his reports on this topic:
Epidemiologists have found for example that deaths from covid have fallen off dramatically, and are not among the potential causes. The primary suspected cause is political responses to the pandemic are now causing excess deaths in global population not due to the virus itself.
One example of this is lockdown, which was predicted by many of the most respected epidemiologists to eventually cause more deaths than covid itself. This is the reason three respected and credentialed epidemiologists put forth the Great Barrington Declaration early in the pandemic. The declaration has now been signed by 16,039 medical and public health scientists, and 47,456 medical practitioners, in case you've heard it is only a few "kooks".
Here's a brief article sympathetic to that point of view:
Great Barrington Declaration Authors Fire Back at NIH and NIAID Bureaucrats
The new mRNA tech can also be considered suspect in this regard. Most countries around the world have agencies that collect reported injuries due to pharmaceutical injuries. Most of these reported injuries cannot be proven in real time of course, but that is not the point of having these systems in place. The point is when these reports increase exponentially in number (relative to the number that receive said pharmaceutical) the potentially dangerous compound will be pulled off the market for further study. Most medications do not generate significantly high reporting, but those that do have always been pulled off for further study.
But mRNA has generated reported injury rates around the world that are exponentially higher than ever, and are not pulled off the market for study. The question is why? Many independent (non-conflicted) epidemiologists around the world want an answer to that question.
If either or both lockdowns and mRNA are found to be statistically significant in the unusually high death rates will we ever hear about it in mass media? It seems unlikely given the fact we are not even hearing about unusually high death rates around the world to begin with.
The way we have always approached safety in medicine has been completely changed, the question is why?
A related question is in the censorship we were subjected to in relation to all things pandemic. Any "health nut" (myself for example) who consistently tracks health related topics does not rely on mass media, which is well known to have a strong bias toward big business sponsors. We instead go to the internet for factual information about studies etc, where legions of epidemiologists and MDs were speaking out against the responses to the pandemic from the very beginning. But not a peep on mass media unless it was to discredit those many opposing experts.
And then we started seeing online censorship, and again the question is why.
No comments:
Post a Comment