These Honorable People

These honorable people of the Canadian Covid Vaccine Inquiry were severely damaged by the pharmacological industries. Even if we give pharma the most generous motive possible...excitement to be introducing a major breakthrough in the prevention and death of disease, this so called vaccine turned out to be a disaster. Why they were apparently so sure a novel genetic manipulation that was  not thoroughly tested was going to be safe is a conundrum of gargantuan proportions. Perhaps it was the whiff of huge profits and Nobel Prizes that did the trick. We cannot help but being disgusted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_GCeTKkqEQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so5qUXaq2hI

Another testimony to the Canadian Covid Inquiry, and perhaps the most powerful

ORDERED TO STAY SILENT: Veteran family doctor details patient injuries at Allison Inquiry

I won't say too much here, this Doctors testimony says it all really.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTuRmsenk-M

Canadian inquiry into mNRA injuries led by Conservative MP Dean Allison

This inquiry was 4 days long, and only concluded recently. I'm not sure how many of these testimonies are being put online, those I've seen are compelling.

Testimony of a policewoman of 40 years 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYtlsi2xRpw

 Silenced soldiers: Lawyer & veteran exposes military vaccine injuries 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKawmqp1gTI

Psychotherapist Lost Her Speech Overnight—Then Came the Gaslighting

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mSstUK9TUI

 

Dangerous Man Made Pathogens

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxsLVnh2TaA

The Truth Reveal Continues

In the pandemic it seemed obvious fairly early on that Big Pharma was running the show for two explicit reasons: one, profit, and two, censorship of the medical scientists and clinical MDs who put ethecs ahead of profit, and were not in the pocket of Big P.

It's a bit odd that so many were taken in, but Big Pharma does own broadcast media, and the script handed down from on high was basically a pack of lies. I say basically because obviously Big P is smoking their own dope, collectively the most profitable industry in the world, and continues to remain blind to their own radically unethical biases.

Stop and think for a moment: the reason the US is the least healthy post industrial country in the world is for one reason exclusively, and that reason is pharmacology.

Well, perhaps that blind is beginning to be torn off. This is, after all, the biggest scandal in US history.

Meanwhile the Senate's inquiry into how Big P repressed the truth in a variety of ways is qute interesting, this particular video clip being one of them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkUsVJ352FI

Dr Peter McCullough speaking before congress on the MRNA Covid 19 vaccine

Which raises a question: why is it that just because we have decoded the human genome we automatically assume it's modification is a good idea? It may be a bit too soon to say this definitively, but it sounds to me like one of the least intelligent ideas imaginable.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqJaM5d7htY

Scientific Censorship

This post will be a follow-up to my previous post on April 12 titled mRNA and Cancer. In this current post the primary author of that paper has published a subsequent paper tilted "Censorship in Science", where he speaks to the difficulty of getting that paper published. And then it becomes obvious the extreme difficulty every author has faced getting legitimate research on the dangers of mRNA "vaccines" published is so extreme that we the public have seen none of this research.

The word "vaccines" are in parenthesis because we should not be so easily taken in by the conflation of the term "mRNA" with the word "vaccine".

Vaccines are not supposed to be dangerous.

And so then one wonders whether we should ever trust any part of the medical establishment again. I have expressed my opinion previously that surgery, if needed, is the best part of modern medicine, and that the current state of pharmacology is by and large a scam of huge proportions, turning, as it does, on the idea diseases caused primarily by poor nutrition can be "fixed" with drugs.

And so it may also be true many family doctors will have little to no knowledge of the large body of legitimate studies showing the dangers of attempting the genetic modification of any part of our biology because those studies have not been published.

Biological evolution is gradual for a reason.

And so... here is the video where the original author speaks to the impossibility of getting this research published in ANY high impact journal, and the extreme difficulty of getting it placed even in a low impact/low readership journal:

Scientific Censorship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0HyRfoM11CU

Nutrition: An American Tragedy

The cause of health continues to elude the majority. The reasons are simple but complex. Simple because the majority consumes "foods" that are addictive and toxic. Complex because addictive toxic substances are very profitable, and consequently there are powerful motives for the food and health care industries to deliberately mislead us about nutrition, profiting on diseases caused by addictive and toxic "food like" substances.

And addiction is a problem. It dulls emotional pain, keeps us in a stupor, and makes us physically ill. How do we deal with emotional pain? Healthy relationships, and if need be, therapy. Or perhaps therapy, leading to healthy relationships.

Surprisingly perhaps, while nutrition can be complex, the basics are fairly simple. And so ironically, most of us have begun developing the consequences of ill health for decades.

 Meanwhile, for the most part we are basically lied to by the health care industry, and the primary lie is that drugs will keep us healthy. Obviously, when we are taking prescription drugs we are not healthy. What can be done about this? Learn the basics of nutrition! It is what makes and keeps us healthy.

Nutrition is found in whole foods, and not found in fast food, processed food, or roughly 85% of the "foods" on sale at standard grocery stores. Yes, even grocery stores are in on it.

Restaurants are in on it too, they are selling something called "hyper-palatability". Let's ask AI for the definition of hyper-palatability...

---------------------------

Hyper-palatability refers to foods formulated to combine fat, sugar, sodium, and carbohydrates in specific amounts that bypass your brain’s natural fullness signals. These specific combinations trigger the brain's reward system, making it difficult to stop eating them even when you are full.

The Science Behind the Cravings
Studies show hyper-palatable foods generally fall into three distinct nutritional combinations:

Fat and Sodium: (e.g., Bacon, pizza, hot dogs) - calories from fat, combined with sodium.

Fat and Sugar: (e.g., Ice cream, cake, cookies) - calories from fat, combined with calories from simple sugars.

Carbohydrates and Sodium: (e.g., Chips, pretzels, crackers) - calories from carbohydrates, combined with sodium by weight.

Why They Are Hard to Resist
Dopamine Release: These combinations stimulate the release of dopamine in the brain, offering a rewarding sensation similar to addictive behaviors.

Lack of Satiety: Because these foods are typically highly processed, they often lack the protein and dietary fiber required to make you feel full, which leads to passive overeating.

Ubiquitous: Studies have shown that the food system in the United States consists of hyper-palatable foods, including items often marketed as healthy or low-fat.

How to Mitigate Hyper-Palatable Food Consumption
Since HPFs can drive calorie intake and weight gain, dietary management often involves specific strategies:

Base meals on whole foods: Unprocessed, whole foods (like vegetables, fruits, and lean meats) rarely occur in hyper-palatable combinations and are rich in fiber and protein.

------------------------

Let's emphasize this part:

"Unprocessed, whole foods, vegetables, fruits, and lean meats, rarely occur in hyper-palatable combinations." 

Which means the vast majority of restaurants are in the hyper-palatability business. But we can eat in restaurants with no health penalty if we order dishes made with simple whole food combinations, and no sugar salt or oil.

There is a common error in the AI version above, and it is confusing and conflating "macro-nutrients" with junk food. 

There are only three macro nutrients: carbohydrates, fats, and proteins (and there are thousands of micro nutrients, vitamins and minerals, contained in the macro nutrients).

The above AI article conflates "junk carbs and junk fats" with healthy whole food macronutrients. This is one of the primary ways the food industry deliberately keeps us confused about nutrition. 

Why would they do that? Profit! Do they care about us? Not really!

So, if your carbohydrates are whole fruits and whole vegetables, they are nutritious, if you are eating salted "french fried" potatoes (cooked in oil), it is a toxic substance and really should not be called a carbohydrate to begin with. 

All you have to remember is this: macronutrients are a whole food, and all three categories, carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, are healthy. Sliced and diced with refined sugar salt and oil, they are not.

Reverse Alzheimers? This Harvard Doctor Explains the Truth

The title of this post is the same as the title of the YouTube  I just watched. I usually do not use the title of a YouTube as the title of a blog post! This has to be one of the best YouTubes since the beginning of YouTubes. There isn't anything for me to add except watch it!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27etnL4lTL8

mRNA and cancer

The studies showing the damage mRNA shots have caused are still coming out, and then many of them are retracted. We are living through an odd moment in the history of technology.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr-WKRRLi9U

Loma Linda Protocol

 

Rebounding Is WAY More Powerful Than You Think

Rebounding is really quite an interesting health intervention, particularly as we age. Dr Yonatan Whitten does an excellent job at explaning why this is the case:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9_xuadwB9Y

The secrets to healthy eating

Eating healthfully is one of the "secrets" of health and vitality. There are others, good sleep, loving relationships, balanced and dynamic movement of the body. I don't know if any of the "secrets" to health and vitality are more important than the others, but I do know eating healthfully is, let's say, a bit more of a mystery or point of contention than some of the others. Good quality of sleep for example...most will agree that good sleep is one of the more important aspects of health and vitality. The various aspects that induce the best health may all be equal, but even if so many of us will be less informed on one in particular.

Meanwhile, the foods we eat have become a huge point of contention for those of us who are interested in optimal health, vitality, and longevity. It is fair to say however, the "diet war" group is for the most part considerably healthier than those who pay little to no attention to quality of food and diet. The obesity rate in the US is the clear marker of this unfortunate state of affairs.

So then, what are these "secrets" of healthy eating? I may not know them all myself, but I will do my best to identify them.

One of them is "easy to digest". This may not sound like a big deal, but in fact is huge. Now, ice cream is easy to digest, but is also lacking in nutrients, so another qualifier of healthy eating is "high in nutrition". Easy to digest and high in nutrition means we are using less energy to aquire our nutrition. More "miles per gallon", we might say. On some level it's all about efficiency.

Let's also say if we tried to live on a diet of pills we wouldn't get very far, so then it becomes obvious that "real food" is the critically important element. 

Then let's also separate the junk from the real, the primary distinction being non-fractionated "whole" foods that arrive to our tables and bodies in as close to their natural state as possible. 

One problem however is whole foods may not taste as good when they are not "seasoned" with highly palatable substances that create a dopamine cascade in the brain. It's not unusual to hear some people refer to destructive and addictive drugs as "dope", a slang term for toxins that make us feel better in the short term, and worse over the long term.

So then one of the conditions that reduces optimal health is "over seasoning" our food, which then creates a pleasurable dopamine cascade in our brain, which reduces the power and efficacy of whole foods. It's a bit odd that we post industrial humans have come to the point we do not necessarily realize the whole fresh unprocessed foods we are biologically adapted to are those that are maximally effective in creating health.

"Frankenfoods", even over seasoned foods, are a mostly unrecognized problem that is highly profitable, for pretty much the same reason drugs are highly profitable...the dopamine cascade in the brain. Restaurants that serve up overly stimulating calories, which is most of them, are to some significant degree responsible for the health destructive obesity problem in the post industrial world.

Food as a drug? Sure, it can be. It's probably safe to say most of obesity is down to this problem because food as a drug is a mostly invisible problem. The profiteers go unperturbed because they are not responsible for the paucity of reliable information on nutrition. 

Table salt is toxic, a primary contributor to the various cardiovascular diseases that kill most of us prematurely.

Another drug masquerading as food is table sugar...100% calories, zero nutrition. (Eat whole fruits, they are real food, and are nutritious, delicious, and quell the refined sugar addiction.)

Another problem hiding in plain sight is refined fats, which we know as vegetable oils, and 100% calories but zero nutrition, and a major contributor to obesity. We don't even know these empty calories are in most foods, and dangerous. After all, they are tasteless. They are also the other major contributor to premature death in the US. 

If refined oils in foods are so destructive to health why are they there to begin with? They make cooking highly palatable substances easier.

So the primary secret to healthful eating is to know the overstimulation of our brain and body with toxic substances is a template unique to post-industrial humans. And then endeavor to adapt to real foods that are non-fractionated and whole. They may not stimulate the taste buds quite as much at first, but as we adapt we will recognize that we feel better, and healthier.

As I've done many times in this blog on health, I will recommend a book that has helped many understand the "food as a drug" problem:

The Pleasure Trap: Mastering the Hidden Force that Undermines Health & Happiness.

What's all the fuss about whole food plant based?

A physician I just learned about will explain it better than I can. Hint: it's multifaceted, perhaps infinately so. 

Meet Dr Rubin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3vvPnOpKBg

The AI Potential for Malevolence....Really?

AI is an interesting technology, and like all technologies will be a double edged sword with unintended consequences difficult to predict.

But I'm having difficulty imagining how a non biological structure can be malevolent. Perhaps the word is being misused?

Malevolence belongs to biology, and mostly to human biology. We don't think of natural disasters as malevolence. We don't think of a cheetah killing and eating a gazelle as malevolent. Malevolence is a deliberate evil rising from a lust for power or hatred. It has an emotional origin.

An AI could be programmed to be destructive, but the malevolence would come from the programmer, not the software. It could happen accidently as an unintended consequence where the human creators had no malevolence. But just as hurricanes are not malevolent because hurricanes do not have feelings, an AI could be programmed to be destructive, deliberately or accidentally, but it would not be malevolent because AI cannot have feelings, it/they are not biological.

Malevolence is very simply an expression of the human capacity for evil. Deliberately teaching an AI to be destructive is malevolent, but the machine itself (with no feelings and no hatred) is not malevolent, the human is.

We won't be able to teach an AI to love either. We will be able to teach it to look and sound like love, but real emotion will not be there.

Think for a moment of some of the emotions an AI cannot possess: Regret, anguish, grief, anger, joy love benevolence.

In fact malevolence and benevolence are opposite emotions, but a computer cannot experience either of them, because machines do not have emotions.

An AI enabled human can have emotions because the human continues to be biological.

Certain science fictions can become reality, but others cannot, and we can have difficulty discerning which is which because of the human tendency toward hubris. Hubris, like its opposite, modesty, arise from the capacity for emotion. Pride is an emotion.

Emotions are the most complex aspect of being human, and for that reason we can both value them and despise them. When we despise them we may try to push them into our unconscious to the extent possible in order to function. Hubris exists mostly on the unconscious level, and it is moderated only by becoming conscious of it.

Think of a current figure on the world stage whose name begins with a T and who appears to have little to no capacity for the moderation of his own hubris. Where there is little capacity for the moderation of hubris there is pathological narcissism, a dangerous psychological disorder.

If we humans ultimately become the authors of our own species destruction, that malevolence resides within us. Nukes and computer technology are not malevolent, using them to kill humans is.

Why do we persist in attributing malevolence to software/hardware? The answer is found in psychology, it's the denial mechanism, a way of not facing and taking responsibility for our own destructivity.

The history of all technological progress may be leading to our own species self destruction, it does sometimes appear to be the case. If so we cannot attribute the fault to technology, which has no conscience, no emotion, no blood, no veins. We would only accurately attribute the self destruction of our own species to our own inability to recognize the hubris in our belief we are the masters of the laws of nature and biology.

Fuhrman - How to Stay Fit and Strong at Any Age: Fitness Tips for Longevity

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SLos6olvQc

Longer, healthier, disease free life span

I'm going to reintroduce Dr Joel Fuhrman in this post for a couple of reasons. One, he now has a podcast with his daughter that I have found to be quite informative over time. And two, he has the most science based approach to healthy eating, disease reversal, and longevity of any other expert health advocate I am aware of.

Two of his recent conversations form a solid introduction, or reintroduction, to his perspective and expertise. 

The first of these deals with a significant problem we face as we age, osteoporosis. In this conversation he speaks mostly to the nutrition issue (but he is also a strong advocate of the importance of resistance training in aging):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjetyNW4ybs

The second conversation is more free ranging, covering a broad range of information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pogyaBqGX64

SHARK!

I was at the gym this morning, and while winding down on the treadmill one of the screens was running a National Geographic special on shark attacks on surfers. It made me wonder how common shark attacks are, so I asked Gemini, the Google AI. My question:

Near the shore humans are an easy target for sharks. Why don’t sharks feed on humans more often?

The answer:

The available information provides a comprehensive understanding of shark feeding behaviors, the rarity of shark attacks on humans, and the reasons why sharks generally do not view humans as prey.

Here is a synthesis of the findings:

1. Shark Feeding Behavior and Preferences: Sharks are opportunistic predators with diverse diets. While some species specialize, most sharks eat a variety of marine life, including fish, crustaceans, mollusks, marine mammals, and other sharks. Large species like great whites, tiger sharks, and bull sharks prey on seals, sea lions, dolphins, and turtles. Sharks often target weak, injured, or dying prey to conserve energy.

2. Frequency of Shark Attacks on Humans: Shark attacks are extremely rare. The International Shark Attack File (ISAF) typically records an average of about 60 to 70 unprovoked attacks globally per year. The risk of being attacked or killed by a shark is statistically minuscule; for instance, you are far more likely to be struck by lightning or killed by a falling coconut.

OK, that is not the complete answer, but I think we can stop at far more likely to be killed by a falling coconut :)

The point is this sort of thing can help us understand mythology a bit better, because mythology typically arises from the unconscious fear of death.

Of the most likely causes of premature death in the US, medical error and iatrogenic death are the third leading cause, behind heart disease and cancer. Iatrogenic death refers to a death caused by medical treatment or medical professionals. This includes errors in diagnosis, treatment, medication, or surgical procedures.

We don't come across this information casually because it tramples on one of our most cherished mythologies. So let's put it this way, we are far more likely to be killed by the medical and pharmacology industries than a coconut falling on our head, but we are far more afraid of being eaten by a shark.

So are we being preyed upon by these industries? Interesting question. Surely not, the medical / pharmacological industry is altruistic, right? Humm. 

On the other hand it does profit from our diseases. In fact these industries are more profitable by orders of magnitude than the other major industries combined. 

Surely however, we are not "preyed upon" by these industries. On the other hand the US, the wealthiest nation in the world, is also the sickest developed nation in the world. Why are we so sick?

Well (no pun intended), these industries can't help themselves, they operate (no pun intended) by the profit motive. Whether they intentionally make us sick is a debatable question. One thing can be sure, as long as they operate by a profit motive they are incentivized to disseminate completely incorrect information as to the cause of health, just as they are incentivized to disseminate completely incorrect information as to the cause of disease.

Many if not most doctors start off with altruistic intentions. It's a reasonably safe bet the ones who stick it out do not end up that way.

And it's more than a sad state of affairs, it's tragic.

In fact, it's a title waiting for a book...

Nutrition: An American Tragedy

Dr. Doug makes his case with unassailable logic

But what he is saying is so foreign to our post modern diet and lifestyle choices we literally can't comprehend the truth of it. Meanwhile the average way of eating these days is making us sicker and sicker, and the so-called health care system is making itself richer and richer.

Is what I just said an oversimplification? 

There are also ever increasing levels of environmental toxicities, and it would be difficult to design and mount studies to determine whether the primary cause of increasing post modern diseases are due primarily to toxins we handle and inhale or to toxins we chew and swallow.

Or even, as it has becomes increasingly apparent, to the drugs pushed on us by big pharma.

With all sources of toxicity in the mix it's difficult to find a definitive answer as to which of these three sources of toxicity is the primarily culprit, but it's interesting to note that one of them, environmental toxicities, we do not choose to ingest into our bodies, as they are in our environment, but highly-palatable toxic substances we do choose to ingest.

So that one source of toxicity is completely under our control. So how do we implement these changes? As Dr. Doug says, eat more fruits and vegetables, in particular the ones that can be eaten raw. 

Fruit till dinner, and salads at dinner, it's not complicated, but to get enough calories you will be eating a higher volume of food than you are used to. Why is that? Plants are high in fiber and low in fat, and fats are very calorie dense. It's basically impossible to get fat or stay fat on a high fiber low fat diet, but the processed food industry doesn't want to tell us the truth about that, and big pharma is happy to tell us Ozempic is the answer to obesity.

It's a lie. But a very profitable lie.

Pharma drugs? We can usually stop ingesting these also, as we make healthier choices as to what we chew and swallow.

If something is highly palatable maybe let's stop falling into that pleasure trap, and choose whole fruits instead. When hyper-palatability is eliminated as a choice the palatability of fruits as our healthy choice comes to the fore.

But won't we become weak eating only plants, especially raw plants? You may find it interesting that Dr. Doug Graham has won the British Masters National Powerlifting competition recently, making it two years in a row.

Dr. Doug Graham's journey into dietary logic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoOtT_slJ-U&t=303s

 

Modern mythologies have become dangerous

Recently I have been writing about modern mythologies that we are generally unaware of, and the dangers they pose. We have a very hard time admitting to our collective selves that mythologies even exist in our modern time of science and technology. Why is this?

There are several aspects to this. First and perhaps most relevant is that mythologies only function when we are completely unaware of them. Mythologies "stand in" as unassailable truths that are simply not questioned. It never occurs to us to even acknowledge they exist in and around us.  We do not think of mythologies any more than we think of the air that we breathe...it's invisible.

Until it's not. Until toxic "air" begins killing and injuring people.

It's an interesting question whether ancient mythologies were as dangerous as modern mythologies. Perhaps they were. Mythology is so inextricably interwoven with fact it is not easily seen. It is probably a significant part of the reason wars happened, and continue to happen.

When mythology is revealed to be a dangerous fiction the collective we are incapable of seeing it. The reason for that is we all carry an unconscious program of immortality. Until we get old or are stricken with early disease we all feel as if we are going to live forever, an inextricable part of the unconscious mind.

Let's admit it, it's difficult to face certain truths. But let's also admit that sometimes it's the best and most constructive thing we can do.

The making of this independent documentary film is a case in point. One point of light among the billions. The film maker tells his story of the walls of silence and denial he faced in the making of it, and now in the showing of it. I think you may find it interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg753aPeGaw

And here is the link to the film itself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwjDeRglkwg