Modern mythologies have become dangerous

Recently I have been writing about modern mythologies that we are generally unaware of, and the dangers they pose. We have a very hard time admitting to our collective selves that mythologies even exist in our modern time of science and technology. Why is this?

There are several aspects to this. First and perhaps most relevant is that mythologies only function when we are completely unaware of them, and what they are. Mythologies "stand in" as unassailable truths that are simply not questioned. It never occurs to us to even acknowledge they exist in and around us.  We do not think of mythologies any more than we think of the air that we breathe...it's invisible.

Until it's not. Until toxic "air" begins killing and injuring people.

It's an interesting question whether ancient mythologies were as dangerous as modern mythologies. Perhaps they were. Mythology is so inextricably interwoven with fact it is not easily seen. It is probably a significant part of the reason wars happened, and continue to happen.

When mythology is revealed to be a dangerous fiction the collective we are incapable of seeing it. The reason for that is we all carry an unconscious program of immortality. Until we get old or are stricken with early disease we all feel as if we are going to live forever, an inextricable part of the unconscious mind.

Let's admit it, it's difficult to face certain truths. But let's also admit that sometimes it's the best and most constructive thing we can do.

The making of this independent documentary film is a case in point. One point of light among the billions. The film maker tells his story of the walls of silence and denial he faced in the making of it, and now in the showing of it. I think you may find it interesting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg753aPeGaw

And here is the link to the film itself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwjDeRglkwg

A deliberate destruction of evidence

Big pharma is doing everything in it's power to prevent studies showing the negative effect of the mRNA jabs reaching conclusion. What are the possible reasons for doing this? Well it's not too hard to figure out. The damage to the pharma industry would be massive. But what about the damage to the innocents who trusted the system? Innocents whose lives and health have been profoundly impacted?

This situation is of historical impact, meanwhile the coverup continues

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVcXT4jhy5I

Why are there so many microcap biotech stocks?

It comes out of a modern immortality mythology. This myth is that by manipulating our genome we will be able to become super healthy, healing all diseases, while reaching maximum happy and healthy life span.

But wait, does this also mean we can continue eating junk foods and drinking booze, and still be super healthy? Big pharma drugs on TV seem to be pushing that idea...

So continue putting toxins in our bodies, get a few super cool genetic modifications, and become super men and women?

The fountain of youth mythology appears in various guises as long ago as the 5th century BC Greece.

We modern technological humans tend to think mythology belonged only to the ancients. And the fact we have science proves it! The end of mythology! 

Yeah, not so fast Oglethorpe, mythology abounds in the age of science, and the two exist side by side, in fact getting along together very nicely.

But science works and mythology doesn't, right? 

Absolutely, the problem being mythology is frequently called science well before being proven. Or worse, called proven when that is not the case, or half-assed "proven", as is so often the case with all those drugs on TV.

All drugs have side effects, and is frequently the case they are six of one, half dozen the other. Meanwhile the cause of health (it's a real thing) has only benefits and no drawbacks. A perceived drawback, the one stopping most people from becoming healthy, is having to give up delicious foods. 

What? No sugar or salt? 

Guess what? Give them up and taste buds go back to being sensitive the way they are in new people. And then something wonderful happens, sensitive buds taste more variety.

The battle of empathic humanity with psychopathic humanity

The above title isn't one I would have come up with, the endocrinologist, author, medical researcher and teacher, professor David Anderson said it in this brief clip talking with John Campbell. It seems humanity is presently at a crossroads from a variety of angles.

But I will repeat something I have said many times in recent blogs, the idea we will improve humanity with genetic modifications is a science fantasy coming out of a lack of understanding of the true cause of health. As but one key example, the cancer epidemic began with the introduction of industrialised food-like substances, and continues accelerating. 

Our great ape cousins have little cancer (quoting Gemini AI):

 "Studies consistently report that cancer, especially epithelial neoplasms like breast, prostate, and lung carcinomas (which are common in humans), are very rare in great apes. While these cancers are responsible for over 20% of human deaths, their incidence in great apes is estimated to be less than 2% or even lower."

Cancer rates in humans were very low before the introduction of industrialized food-like substances. The idea we don't know the exact cause of these food borne diseases is an example of willful ignorance. Yes, if we were breathing dirty air and drinking dirty water this would rival dirty food as a cause, but the fact is for the most part the air we breath and the water we drink is exponentially cleaner than the industrialized fast foods being sold on every street corner.

Since the beginning of the industrial revolution technology began degrading human health, and the answer, say the technologists, will be more technology.

We all like technology for many good reasons. But we could be doing much better at seeing and dealing with the unintended consequences of each technology individually, well before it's too late to do anything about them.

It can be said, as a result, humans are collectively self-destructive. And the battle of empathic humanity with psychopathic humanity may be reaching a critical stage. The psychopaths are loud, devious, and narcissistic. Will the empaths have the inner strength to ward off the psychopaths? Looking back on history to this point it's a difficult question, empaths tend to see the best in people and not recognize the degree of threat in the narcissistic psychopaths

Well, listen to this conversation and see what you think:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7-OEGkN008