Sunday, May 5, 2024

Encouraging movement

Again, a balanced and informed brief video from Dr John Campbell. This man has been an angel. For those not familiar he has written a brief bio:

"I am a retired Nurse Teacher and A and E nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally."

He has also written two books for nursing students on physiology and pathophysiology, available as free downloads here:

https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/generate.php?DRJOHNCAMPBELLEBOOK

And the video with Dr Campbell on the topic of a recent New York Times article titled "Thousands Believe Covid Vaccines Harmed Them. Is anyone Listening?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boqKzpftNSI&t=4s



I am going to editorialize briefly. I have never been anti vaxx, and have never resisted getting a vaccine. However as I aged and looked at statistical likelihoods re various diseases I realized odds of contraction were generally low, and I stopped bothering with vaccines unless required for travel. 

In the early stage of the pandemic, I believed the narratives we were fed via mass media, got the first mRNA jab and was sick for 6 weeks. Nothing too dramatic, a condition called pityriasis rosea, manifesting as welts and small puss pimples all over my torso, with a significant level of fatigue. Before the mRNA rollout pityriasis rosea was "very rare", and "cause unknown", but a few years later were "quite common", and an "autoimmune condition".

Interesting.

I've never had a previous vaccine reaction beyond sore arm and slight fever for a day or two.

I also had become a health nut decades prior to the pandemic as a result of the diagnosis of advanced cardiovascular disease, being told by two different cardiologists I was a candidate for heart attack "any day now". My normal weight is 150 lbs, at that point I was about 210, and was having every symptom of advanced heart disease, some I had never heard of. There is something like 10 different symptoms, and I was experiencing all of them.

The good news is with diet, exercise, and mindfulness study I regained robust health over a period of a few years. Then eight years ago when I was signing up for medicare I was asked several questions by more than one interviewer: "what medications do you take". "None"....pause.... "are you sure?"

Since that time I have been asked this question many times, the answer remains "none", and there is always a reaction similar to the above. It's as if the vast majority of our population does not realize "lifetime" pharmaceuticals are not only not necessary, but the actual logistics of disease reversal are really quite simple.

It begins with "do not put anything in your body that is not real food". Using the word "real" because apparently most do not realize we are so sick in this country primarily because we are not eating real food.

And fortunately, I was already plugged into a vast network of health nuts, vocational and avocational alike, and the conversations in that universe were increasingly about a proportionally large number of mRNA injuries. How large? The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system (VARES) was collecting numbers of injuries with temporal correlation to the jabs that was off the scale compared with any other vaccine in history.

As the numbers grew rapidly they surpassed all vaccines in history combined, as a ratio to numbers vaccinated.

I hesitate to use the word vaccine to describe mRNA technology at this point, because legally, if going by preexisting laws and regulations, they would be identified as genetically modified substances, which would require an entirely different approval system and would not have been called vaccines, and promoted as such. They might never have been approved as a pharmacological intervention at all in fact.

And if they ever were, would have required years of legal wrangling to get there.

Meanwhile there was, as part of the rollout narrative, that we were in an abject emergency that might kill half of global population. But in the earliest stages of the pandemic there were studies conducted by some of the most pedigreed epidemiologists on planet earth to determine actual lethality, and which found this virus was benign relative to the dire prognostication. It can also be said the health care system itself, guided by BigP, refused to do common sense measures like early treatment. Thus the numbers that did occur were "jacked", according to many doctors and nurses. 

Surely that was not intentional! Why? Because if so it would have risen to the level of "crime against humanity"... and surely we have not fallen to such an abject level of extreme greed to do such a thing.

Meanwhile, some were given early treatment in the form of "antiviral cocktails" regardless of Big P's commands, and typically recovered quickly if caught in the early stages. The most well known case is Trump, who entered hospital pretty sick already, with the cards stacked against his recovery...old and overweight. He was treated with an antiviral cocktail and left the hospital 3 days later.

And the emergency use authorization for mRNA injections could not have occurred if there existed a pre-existing effective treatment.

So why were BigP and the captured regulatory agencies so insistent on bending the rules?

And why wasn't the mRNA recalled, as would have been done in any previous vaccine rollout that collected a significant number of VAERS reports, not to mention all previous VAERS reports were  tiny compared to the mRNA?

I think there are two reasons:

1) The pharma industry has become the most politically powerful single industry in history, and gets what it wants, and what it wants is power and extreme profit.

2) Cracking the genetic code (the human genome) is considered by many the single most important scientific breakthrough in history, and with this knowledge all disease, and perhaps aging itself, will be cured. 

No matter whatever kind of crap we put in our bodies.

Personally I feel messing around with the genome is going to blow up in our collective face. And this conclusion does not require a religious belief, it only requires a recognition of the biological complexity that is earth we will likely never understand completely.

In a similar vein, looking outward (the universe), as opposed to inward (biology), the idea the human species will conquer space travel to the extent we can populate Mars (etc Ad infinitum) because we have "used up" Earth is massively stupid. Pretty much the same stupid as thinking we will completely understand biology.

Creativity and destructivity are both nested in the unconsciousness. We humans are capable of great creativity and equally great destructivity. The unconscious denial of the destructive potential part of this equation can get us "killed"... let's not do that.

Greed overrides common sense however, and this is where much of the denial of the obvious comes from.

All of which is inconvenient for the pharma industry, not to mention the deeply indebted US government so dependent on the revenues generated by pharma and the health care system, which are larger than any other industry or economic sector in history.

And finally, here we have the health nuts who do not put any foreign substance in their bodies, including any medication, that is not absolutely necessary. Which means as close to never as possible. But I did, and then didn't need to be told twice to not have another genetic modification of my body, thankyouverymuch.

Oh, and BTW, we health nuts who do not put foreign substances into our bodies have always been opposed to the genetic modification of our commercial food supplies. Which is simply the precautionary principle in action, another way of saying: 

Let's use common sense, shall we?

1 comment: