Monday, December 16, 2024

Are Humans in control of the Earth, or is Earth in control of the Humans?

The answer to that question essentially boils down to whether we humans are in control of our instincts or whether our instincts are in control of us. The old saw we only use 10% of our brain is IMHO part true and part false. Most of the processing done by our brain and nervous system is completely unconscious. In other words we don't have to remember to breath to survive, and if we don't remember to sleep the brain/nervous system will force sleep upon us.

Etcetera, ad infinitum.

I asked an AI how many unconscious autonomic processes the brain/nervous system is running continuously, the answer below seems to infer this approximate number is not known:

>The brain and body are constantly running numerous autonomic processes, including heart rate regulation, breathing, digestion, blood pressure control, sweating, salivation, and the movement of food through the intestines, all managed by the autonomic nervous system without conscious thought; essentially, these processes are happening continuously without you needing to actively think about them.<

So let's just say then the neurological space required for running and maintaining the body is considerably larger than the neurological space the rational and reasoning conscious mind uses.

Is that a disturbing thought? Maybe for some who tend to think of the reasoning mind as all there is. We humans are, after all, the only rational species on Earth, and we have created advanced technologies. So on the whole we are in control of the Earth...right? But how much of this human creativity is built upon the precursor platform of the unconscious instinctual mind?

And the answer is, obviously, all of it. All of the product of our human mind comes forth from the biology of the Earth. Biology is itself, as far as we know, an unconscious process. And compared to the length of time we modern big brained humans have been here, biology has proven itself to be extremely durable. Several extinction events (of biology) have come and gone, and biological Earth has survived, and is still here.

And humans are anthropocentric - definition:

>To regard humankind as the central or most important element of existence, especially as opposed to God or animals.<

All of existence? A definition that would, ironically, make us God. Or only human existence? Which might make a modicum of sense...maybe.

Meanwhile, in the context of anthropocentrism, we seem to have collectively forgotten we are biology, and the product of biology, which is the only avenue by which we have arrived here, to begin with.

So, Earth birthed biology, and biology birthed humans. Biological Earth was here long before us, and will very likely be here long after we are gone.

That also means, BTW, that biology birthed technology, and the modern mythology that technology will make us a permanent fixture in the cosmos is the same basic mythology we humans have always created (ie, immortality).

Technology is a minor miracle, no doubt about it. The major miracle, biology, is the one we under appreciate.

So perhaps if we humans develop a little less hubris we might extend the duration of our time here a bit longer than we would otherwise.

Remembering the definition of hubris:

>A noun that means excessive pride or arrogance that can lead to failure or ruin.<


Saturday, December 7, 2024

A picture is worth a thousand words

A friend sent this for our mutual digestion of the facts (click for bigger, then click on the black border to return to this page):




Or perhaps I should have said indigestion, because that is the basic problem. But there are several points to cover in gaining understanding of the facts that have caused the US health disaster illustrated above.

Note I am using the term disaster in full knowledge the so called health care system is a principal cause of this health disaster: pharmaceutical products are not food, they are toxic substances promoted to fix the problems of a very bad standard diet. The pharma industry refuses to acknowledge diet is the primary problem because the bad american diet is the primary source of their profits.

But it is the food, plain and simple.

Question: how can piling toxins on top of toxins fix anything? It can't, it only makes matters worse, which goes a long way toward understanding the picture above.

There is such a thing as life saving drugs, we may need them temporarily, if, for example, we are in a bad car accident. But let's not confuse the two... 98% of pharma's profitable output does not belong in that category. Cancer high blood pressure and heart disease are not in that category because they are primarily caused by toxic foods. Big P will disagree with that, but it's clear these chronic conditions were rare or non-existent until toxic foods arrived.

The current obsession with genetic manipulation to fix problems caused by toxic foods will be another (highly profitable) blind alley.

Let's define the word food to mean the basic substances that are the cause of health. We could also talk about the cause of health being clean air, good sleep, vigorous movement of the body, and loving relationships. Of course these are important, but taken as a whole, these are NOT the basic problems causing the health disaster picture above. There is great confusion on this point, and it exacerbates the problem, and propagates it forward.

And it is compounded by the drugs doctors give us to "fix" the problems caused by toxic food like substances.

Why isn't exercise the fix to this problem? The toxic american diet clogs our system so badly the body's detoxification efforts become overwhelmed. Toxins come in faster than the body can get them out. And the body is a detox machine!

When the body no longer has to fight the tide of sludge coming in, it becomes strong and healthy. Then energy to move the body comes naturally, and movement makes it stronger and healthier.

When your body has high levels of energy it WANTS to move. This is true regardless of age. We do slow with age, but not nearly to the extent we have been led to believe. When we see vibrant lean and strong 80 year old people you know they didn't get there putting by toxins in their bodies.

Yes, vibrant lean and strong 80 year old people do still exist.

Instead our diet is crap food and drink, and pharmaceutical products. Definition of diet: it goes in the mouth and is swallowed.

We are not being told how bad our diet is, and this problem (big problem) is primarily at the feet of the unholy alliance of the toxic corporate food filling 90% of grocery shelves, the pharmaceutical industry piling toxins on top, and medical doctors mis-educated by a delusional pharmaceutical industry that assumes as a basic premise toxins are going to produce health.

And yes, MDs who have fully realized the cause of health and yet remain silent, are a part of the problem.

What can an individual do? It's not easy going against a prevailing culture even when it is corrupt (or perhaps especially when it is corrupt). But if you want to live a long and healthy life, first things first you have to recognize that the level of corruption is high, and then recognize health is the more important asset you possess and are IN CONTROL OF. And then you have to develop enough drive to educate yourself, which is also not easy because there is a forest of misinformation out there.

The primary overview is this: whole foods combined simply, primarily plants, and those primarily uncooked.

Ask 100 people at random if they are healthy, the majority will say yes. Then factor in that 80-90% of the general population in the US is not healthy. Pretty much everyone past 50 is on pharmaceuticals, is a social drinker, eats hyper-palatable crap, and is too tired to move the body with sufficient vigor.

This is what you are up against, and it is easier to go with the flow. 

Tell yourself, "I want to be strong and happy" (yes they are directly related), make your own flow, and go with that.

And you will have fun doing it. What's better than fun?

Saturday, November 30, 2024

The truth will out - a double header post

There were basically three disastrous ways the pandemic was handled, forced mandates, censorship, and lockdown. Between Bhattacharya and Dowd we get an abbreviated overview.

Bhattacharya

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MNKKDfV3Uk


Friday, November 29, 2024

They've created a monster!!!! (the truth will out)

I suffered a relatively minor injury with the first mRNA dose, and I've also understood for some time that most people do not take a statistical perspective on relative dangers. So then, how statistically likely was it that it was only I, out of millions, who was injured? I decided immediately not to get the second jab, and the confirmation was my GP who was an older guy with some mileage on his career who leaned in and said quietly I might want to consider not getting the second dose.

Yep something was fishy. Then there was TV. I don't usually watch it, but wanted to see what was being said, and it was shocking....the hysterical tone was off the charts. And I had already been following doctors for years whose careers were healing people of the too common chronic diseases by getting them off pharma meds and onto health inducing foods and lifestyle choices.

So the truth will out, but it will take time. 

This post is about a hedge fund statistician who had healed his own chronic condition with diet lifestyle a decade or so earlier, and knew from that personal experience that pharmaceuticals are mostly ineffective and dangerous. He began doing research in a team of a few others, and here he presents what they learned. If you would like an earlier view of the truth coming out this interview of the brilliant Ed Dowd speaking about his findings will take you there.

Interviewed by a well known  Scottish blogger, Neil Oliver:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GVG_w7-xsE




Thursday, November 28, 2024

Why was the mRNA product such a health disaster?

Dr Clancy explains:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqjYmu93sFg




FANTASTIC NEWS!

Dr. Suneel Dhand celebrates the possibility for sanity to return to a health care system dominated by the power mad greedy and corrupt pharma industry and the World Health Organization. Greed is incredibly bias inducing, so yes, by and large the pharma industry apparently believes it is doing the right things for the health of the population, in spite of the obvious: the more pharma products taken the sicker the population becomes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-zclITSKcI




And if you've watched Dr Dhand above, you know his fantastic news is Dr Jay Bhattacharya being selected by Trump to be the next head of the NIH. If you're not all that familiar with Dr Bhattacharya you can get an accurate impression watching the video below.









Wednesday, November 27, 2024

Kick that shit to the curb

Diabetes is the number one health problem in the US, the least healthy population in the developed world. That is the definition of crazy. Don't get me started on why the US population is so misinformed on metabolic health, but I will say just one thing on that topic then on to solutions:  Misinformation (and lack of correct information) is the biggest source of revenue for the good ole US of A. We have gotten ourselves into this crazy place where the government gets most of its revenue by making and keeping its citizens sick. Big pharma puts one trillion a year into government coffers, most of it coming from lifelong prescriptions. Add big food revenues to that and you have the answer to all the revenue problems the fat and sick US govt has to contend with.


We are stuck, as a country, in a metabolic health jam we can't get out of easily. A country that depends on a sick population for economic health? How long can that go on before the empire collapses?

Government should teach the true cause of metabolic health in school. It wouldn't cost much, but they cannot afford a healthy population.

I think a look at the Fuhrman's program is a good idea, he's a good jew, was a member of the US Figure Skating Team and placed second in the US National Pairs Championship in 1973. Then he became an MD who was focused on helping people understand why they are getting sick from their diet. I promise you this: if you understand his program and follow it you will kick prediabetes to the weeds in a short time. But he is not alone, there are dozens of MDs who all advocate the same basic program, and write books about understanding it and how to do it. Fuhrman has written a lot of books:

He runs a retreat program in Cali that teaches this, but it ain't cheap.

Anyway...yes, whole wheat pasta is not the problem. It's "close enough" to a whole food to fit into a healthy diet. To understand metabolic health you have to understand the importance of whole foods, and macros, and most importantly the ratio of fats to carbohydrates. If someone is basically on a whole food plant based diet and they want to be metabolically healthy they will keep the ratio of fats to carbohydrates on the low side. That means calories coming from animal products will be on the low side. 

Animal products being all protein is one of the misinformation pieces that gets us in trouble...these calories are mostly coming from fat. I am not saying animal products are not high in protein, they are, but they still have more calories coming from fat than protein. One you get that piece you are on the way. And this is the reason understanding the macro ratios is key also.

The bad american diet is a mess of problems, the idea you need to eat animal products to get protein is one of them. The other problems have mostly to do with the fact we do not eat a whole food diet, and eating concentrated calories with no vitamins and minerals is part of the disaster that is the american diet. Most of those empty calories come from refined fat (vegetable oils) and refined carbs (pure sugars).

Basically if all you did is eat whole foods, no empty calories at all, you are pretty much there. That part is simple to understand but hard to do because we are addicted to hyper-palatable toxic substances disguised as foods.

What is dessert? Basically, pure fats and pure sugars combined. Think about this - fats do not have much flavor on their own. They have to be mixed with other flavors, or caramelized by cooking at high heat, to taste like something. So why are pure fats in desserts? The combo is addicting. Why? This is a significant part of the puzzle: we have the instincts of early humans, we are programmed to seek calories, which were rare in nature back then, and pure fats and sugars (no vitamins and minerals) triggers that instinct more than anything else. We cannot resist hyper-palatability easily. 

In prehistoric days that instinct worked just fine...THERE WERE NO EMPTY CALORIE FOODS BACK THEN. Today, without understanding why we are irresistibly attracted to hyper-palatability we are fucked. One you understand it you can manage it. Otherwise you are a victim of the food industry that does not care if you get sick, as long as they make their billions. And BigP, their partner in crime. And it is literally a crime against humanity.

Dessert is not a treat! It is a poison that causes poor metabolic health, usually manifesting as diabetes. 

Kick that shit to the curb.

Tuesday, November 26, 2024

Cancer cure experiences

It's been known for some time that people who lead robustly healthy lives are much less likely to come down with cancer than couch potatoes snacking on hyper palatable ultra processed food like substances most grocery stores make the majority of their profit on.

There have also been countless cases of terminal cancer diagnoses that were reversed with alternative approaches. When oncologists have patients who've been given a terminal diagnosis recover anyway, the recoveries are dismissed as "spontaneous remissions".

Dr John Campbell who remains right in the thick of it is discussing the many recoveries from advanced cancers that have been reported to him. It's an interesting listen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5shGPTTTR8





Saturday, November 16, 2024

Beyond blame with Dr Tim Kelly

From my perspective this conversation based on an essay by Dr. Tim Kelly, an unusual blend of systems analyst and practicing medical doctor, is a fair and honest perspective on what I continue to think of as the GMO "vaccine" debacle.

It can be difficult to reframe aspects of our thinking that are basically mythological mixed with some aspects of reality, which is basically what mythology is, and to be fair is inescapable. But the attempt will be necessary to apprehend and contextualize the social manipulation spawned by the pandemic period.

Consider, if there was an overt and covert agenda of control of the population, we know we humans have rational thinking, but we seem to forget we also have the same instincts of all animals, a survival instinct (eat or be eaten) that exists on a mostly unconscious level, and so easily rationalized away.

A case can be made in fact that we are "driven" more by survival instinct than by rational thinking, and a significant part of human "maturity" is to understand the dynamic interplay of these two forces. Both drive instinct and reason are critical components of the whole, and we can't just be one or the other, no matter how much we would like it to be the case. Integration is key to functional perspective.

See if you agree this conversation and essay go some distance toward a cogent and rational framing of this period, which continues to be propagated forward by conventional pharmacological perspectives on health and how health is best achieved.

The essay

https://thehopeaccord.org/BeyondBlame/

The conversation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqyuyYI_6oY




Friday, November 15, 2024

RFK Jr, we salute you

In a blog named Courageous Discourse that Dr Peter McCullough is involved with, here is the salute to RFK:

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/ave-rfk-jr-we-salute-you?utm_campaign=email-half-post&r=71w24&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

And if Dr McCullough is not a prime example of courageous I'm not sure who is. Of course he was aware of Big P's extreme level of corruption, but in spite of it was still surprised at their totalitarian moves during the pandemic. Many individual MDs who knew early treatment was the best course of action proceeded in treating patients, and some even spoke out (courageously) against that extreme level of Pharma corruption and power at the risk of their positions and livelihoods.

I for one am very happy to be politically independent in these very murky waters. I've railed against Trump's narcissism in my blog, but I will say appointing RFK Sec of Health was an encouraging move.

I will be a bit surprised if RFK actually takes office, swimming, as he is, in more toxic waters then was the Hudson River before he successfully sued the polluters.

I will also say to those who have bought the BigP narratives regarding RFK: the collective we have been brainwashed.

And the text of the Courageous Discord blog:

If RFK, Jr.’s appointment to become Secretary of Health and Human Services is confirmed by the Senate, this New Sheriff In Town will be in a position to make life uniquely uncomfortable for the legion of captured bureaucrats who infest the many agencies that will be obliged to report to him.


I worry this may be a big if, as I imagine the Vaccine Cartel is currently pulling every string, calling every favor, and even resorting to threats and blackmail in order to prevent RFK, Jr.’s confirmation. It reminds me of the treacherous adversity Cicero faced when he made the bold decision to prosecute Gaius Verres on the charge of misconduct, especially extortion, during his term as governor of Sicily (73-71 BC). Cicero was a lawyer of the equestrian class. Verres was one of the most powerful patricians in Rome with extensive connections in the Senate and every other institution, not to mention nefarious characters who could procure an assassin for him.


RFJ, Jr.s appointment to HHS Secretary may be the greatest turning of the tables story in U.S. political history, and I almost wish Anthony Fauci were still head of NIAID so that he could meet his new boss in January.


Despite suffering from spasmodic dysphonia, RFK, Jr. has proven to be one of America’s strongest voices in defending our Constitutional Republic from public health officials and politicians wielding emergency power. In rousing speeches reminiscent of his father’s famous University of Capetown address in 1966, he has articulated why we should never allow our constitution to be compromised by fallible men who promise to keep us safe.


For decades, he worked as an environmental attorney to protect the natural world from corporate industrial polluters. He has been especially troubled by the contamination of our waterways with hazardous waste, including mercury. In 2005 he became concerned about a mercury compound used as a preservative in childhood vaccines, which prompted him to conduct a thorough investigation of vaccine safety in general. He quickly realized that the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act had granted vaccine manufacturers too much immunity from civil and criminal liability for injuries or deaths caused by their products. In the absence of legal liability, the only thing that could possibly regulate their conduct was scrutiny from a public figure like him.


The vast majority of men of his social status would have concluded that taking on the Vaccine Cartel was far more daunting than David taking on Goliath, and that doing so was a surefire way to personal ruin. It took a man of RFK, Jr.s extraordinary qualities—bold, energetic, and diligent combined with a love of adventure, a streak of derring-do, and measure of devil may care—to enter the water with this leviathan.


Sure enough, his critical questioning of vaccine safety was not met with debate, but with vitriolic, ad hominem attacks and accusations of being a conspiracy theorist. Implied in these attacks is that no one should dare even question the safety of vaccines.


After being in the wilderness of media blackouts and social ostracism for decades, RFK, Jr. has, with true grit, made his way to the center stage of federal authority with a clear mandate to promote the health and well-being of the American people. In terms of a man overcoming adversity, his story is one for the ages.

Etymological roots are like the mysterious intelligence of the underground mycelium

Mycelium is a root-like structure of a fungus that is made up of a mass of thread-like hyphae. It can be found in soil, inside plants and animals, and under the reproductive structures of fungi.

Mycelium has many functions, including:
  • Breaking down organic matter
    Mycelium releases enzymes that break down organic matter into smaller parts that feed the fungi, other organisms, and their plant partners. 
  • Connecting plants
    Mycelium connects individual plants together through a network called the "mycorrhizal network". This network transfers water, carbon, nitrogen, and other minerals between plants. 
  • Producing visible structures
    Mycelium can develop into visible structures like mushrooms, puffballs, brackets, sclerotia, stinkhorns, toadstools, and truffles. 
Mycelium has many properties, including: Fire resistance, Lightweight, Strength, and Acoustic insulation.

Saturday, November 2, 2024

Basically, Trump is an idiot...let me explain

One of my favorite Dostoevsky novels is "The Idiot", a story about a kind and gentle man with very high intelligence. In today's parlance he might have been thought of as aspergers, or extremely introverted, but in any case Dostoevsky's idiot was socially inept, making one social blunder after another. 

This wouldn't be Trump, as he is not a kind and gentle man.

Another of my favorite Dostoevsky novels is "Crime and Punishment", about another intelligent individual who recognized that morality was in some part a "social teaching" so that citizens would behave constructively and society was not brutal and chaotic. Recognizing his own intelligence, he rationalized morality as a construct, not an absolute, and he then deduced that people who strictly observed these moral constructs were fools. To prove this to himself he hatched a plan to murder his landlady, which he carried out. His plan was methodical and he "got away" with the crime. Gradually however, he descended into madness as guilt overtook him, and to put an end to his madness he turned himself in to the police. 

This is not Trump either, as Dostoevsky's character had a conscience.

Freud's simplest construct of human psychology has three parts: the id, the ego, and the superego. 

The id is the part of the mind where instinct lives, where "the drives" play out more or less unconsciously, to eat, to love, to procreate, and to take revenge on individuals, and make war against societies.

The ego is one's conscious sense of "who I am", "my name is David", etc. It is complex self identity.

And the superego is where morality is housed, which unbeknownst to Dostoevsky's character is an important part of the human mind. The superego is the part that moderates id impulses, which can be destructive and violent, and keeps them in check.

Some people have a giant id, a tiny superego, and a grandiose ego. We identify these people as pathological sociopathic narcissists. Their psychological structure is imbalanced, and consequently they are a danger to others.

These individuals do not understand the concept of service work, it's all about them. It would probably be accurate to say every genocide committed throughout history was the work of a pathological narcissist...no empathy and no conscience.

So, how can someone of high intelligence be an idiot? They are driven primarily by their id.

Thus, Trump is an idiot.

Tuesday, October 22, 2024

Trump is nothing more than a malignant pathological narcissist

Turns out however just being that one thing covers a significant amount of territory.

Examples:

- Incapable of considering the needs of others in any significant fashion. Including you and me.

- Capable of beguiling others who are not yet informed in the seductive powers of a malignant pathological narcissist.

- A pathological grandiosity of the sort dictators have, and of the sort that is capable of committing genocides. Other humans are inconvenient in any significant way? Just murder them. 

Please note as well, the political colleagues who favor him are themselves either beguiled or a pathological narcissist themselves with sinister motives.

So: a fan base who is either beguiled or sinister themselves.

And we want him to be the one who runs our country?

Tuesday, October 15, 2024

MRNA Vaccine Moratorium

This is a video you will want to watch if, like me and many others, you feel there are serious issues with the mRNA technology platform.

I first became concerned when I suffered an mRNA vaccine injury after the first dose, and chose not to take another one. The hundreds of thousands of reported mRNA injuries have varied from moderate to fatal, I was fortunate my situation seems to have resolved in the six weeks immediately following the first and only dose. The kinds of injuries caused have varied so greatly the product could almost be called a broad spectrum anti-biological, that is, broad based in its harms.

And I will mention again I have never been opposed to conventional vaccines, but since recovering from advanced heart disease myself 20 years ago by a change of diet alone (Esselstyn whole food plant based protocol), my eyes have been opened to the damage pharmacology has caused to our knowledge of nutrition, and as a result I am skeptical of pharmacology products in general.

The consequence of the political problem bears repeating:

Pharmacology has become so profitable it effectively "owns" governments, and is the primary force spearheading the mad rush from democracy to autocracy.... A system of government by one person with absolute power. 

Does that remind us of anyone?

Here Dr John Campbell is speaking with Tim Kelly MD, the doctor who initiated The Hope Accord.







Saturday, October 12, 2024

The biggest vaccine controversy since the advent of vaccines

The biggest vaccine controversy since the advent of vaccines is gaining momentum and power. Meanwhile governments everywhere blindly mandated the first mass scale genetic modification of humans in history, taking the advice of the pharma industry, which has integrated itself into all major governments in the developed world. 

They have done this by virtue of one thing primarily: the revenue streams all governments need to keep everything going. It is not the efficacy of the products on the whole, since it is increasingly clear the more pharma products taken by the public, the progressively worse the overall health of the public becomes. 

There is another factor of course, the processed food industry, which along with pharma has formed the most corrupt industrial duopoly since the advent of the industrial revolution.

Of course if one is not "health fanatic" research oriented it's unlikely one will know of the levels of real science being done revealing the dangers to health and life itself these RNA products have caused. And it is unlikely most will not know of the real science being done for the simple reason it is still being censored in social and mass media.

And I say "real" science for the simple reason the so-called science funded by the developers and profiteers (of anything) is de facto biased, and the entire point of science is the elimination of bias isn't it? How is it governments have allowed this travesty to begin with, and grow?

Again, revenues, the life blood of governments. And now with economic systems around the world teetering, the situation is out of hand and gaining intractability.

A member of the Australian parliament has written a public letter to the prime minister of Australia, backed by scientists and medical doctors, asking for immediate suspension of the RNA product for further independent study. And this is based on quite a lot of pre-existing independent study already.

We'll see what comes of this, it's hard to imagine governments will be persuaded given the deep layer of egg on their collective face. And if not persuaded, it would seem to move most of the developed world further toward a new collective totalitarianism.

Dr John Campbell has been covering this, here is the most recent:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICNdzPC2ExY&t=35s




Tuesday, October 8, 2024

Why consume empty calories when whole food nutrient dense options are available?

Debating with ChatGPT the popular meme that olive oil is a healthy choice to include in our diets.

The Mediterranean diet is successful in spite of olive oil, not because of it, and is improved with the exclusion of it. Adding empty calories to any diet degrades that diet, and a diet based solely on whole foods takes maximum advantage of the ratio of nutrient density to calories.

It is not widely appreciated that pure oils extracted from any plant type are empty calorie substances, which means the ratio of micronutrients (vitamins, minerals and other phytochemicals) relative to calories is so low as to be negligible. The massive level of added calories from oils with negligible nutrition to modern diets is a leading cause of the obesity epidemic, equal to, or even greater than, the empty calories from refined sugars added to commercial "food like" products.

And it only makes sense to define foods as substances that cause health and long energetic lives doesn't it? We wouldn't define poisons as foods would we? Well refined carbs and fats are both poisons that shorten life and create misery.

The "debate" with Chat GPT below:

me: I question the idea that olive oil is “healthy “. It has all the fat and none of the nutrients of whole olives, meaning it is an empty calorie food. Comments?

gpt: Your concern about olive oil being an “empty calorie” food because it lacks the fiber and other nutrients found in whole olives is valid from a certain perspective. 

It’s true that olive oil is a concentrated source of fat, and like any oil, it’s calorie-dense. However, olive oil is widely considered beneficial for health, particularly when compared to other sources of fats like butter or refined oils. Here’s why: 

1. Nutritional Profile • Monounsaturated Fats: Olive oil, particularly extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), is rich in monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), primarily oleic acid. MUFAs are considered heart-healthy fats that can help reduce levels of LDL (“bad”) cholesterol, while maintaining or even raising HDL (“good”) cholesterol. • Polyphenols: EVOO, which is less processed than other types of olive oil, contains high levels of polyphenols, powerful antioxidants that help reduce inflammation and oxidative stress. These compounds, such as hydroxytyrosol and oleuropein, have been linked to benefits in cardiovascular health, cognitive function, and potentially even in reducing the risk of chronic diseases like Alzheimer’s. • Vitamins: Olive oil contains fat-soluble vitamins, especially vitamin E and K, which support cell protection and blood clotting, respectively. Though it doesn’t contain the full range of nutrients that whole olives do, it still offers some key micronutrients. 

2. Calorie Density vs. Nutritional Quality • While olive oil is calorie-dense, those calories are not necessarily “empty” in the way you might classify refined sugars or processed fats. The calories come from beneficial fats and antioxidants that contribute to better health when consumed in moderation. • Whole olives do contain fiber and a wider variety of nutrients (like iron and calcium), but when comparing them to olive oil, the nutritional role of olive oil is more focused on delivering healthy fats in a concentrated form. 

3. Health Benefits in Research • Heart Health: Olive oil is a staple in the Mediterranean diet, which is consistently associated with lower rates of heart disease. Studies have shown that replacing saturated fats (like butter) with olive oil can improve lipid profiles and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. • Cognitive Health: Olive oil’s anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, especially those from polyphenols, are thought to help protect brain cells from oxidative damage. Research has suggested that regular consumption of olive oil, particularly extra virgin olive oil, may support cognitive health and reduce the risk of neurodegenerative diseases. • Metabolic Health: Some studies indicate that olive oil may help improve insulin sensitivity and reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes, likely due to its beneficial fat composition. 

4. Context Matters • The healthiness of olive oil depends on how it’s used in your diet. In the context of a balanced, whole-foods-based diet, where it’s used to replace less healthy fats or enhance the absorption of fat-soluble nutrients (like vitamins A, D, E, and K from vegetables), it can be part of a healthy dietary pattern. • However, if olive oil is consumed in excess, or used to prepare heavily fried or processed foods, its benefits might be negated by other unhealthy elements of the diet. Conclusion While olive oil lacks the fiber and some micronutrients of whole olives, its rich content of healthy fats and antioxidants gives it a place in many healthy diets. It’s not quite accurate to call it “empty calories” because of its nutrient-dense fats and polyphenols. However, your point that it’s calorie-dense without the fiber and broader nutrients of whole foods is important, especially in the context of an overall balanced diet.

me: Forget comparisons to other oils, all are empty calorie substances (not food). Can anyone point specifically to a variety of specific nutrients in olive oil? Vitamins, minerals?

gpt: Your skepticism is understandable. While olive oil is calorie-dense and doesn’t provide the same broad range of nutrients as whole foods, it does contain some specific compounds that contribute to its health benefits. However, you’re correct that it lacks many of the nutrients found in whole, unprocessed plant foods. Here’s a detailed look at the nutritional content of olive oil: 

1. Vitamins • Vitamin E (tocopherols): Olive oil, particularly extra virgin olive oil, is a rich source of vitamin E. This fat-soluble antioxidant helps protect cells from oxidative stress and supports immune function and skin health. The amount of vitamin E in olive oil can vary, but typically, a tablespoon of extra virgin olive oil provides about 1.9 mg of vitamin E, roughly 13% of the recommended daily intake. • Vitamin K: Olive oil also contains small amounts of vitamin K, which plays a role in blood clotting and bone health. A tablespoon of extra virgin olive oil contains about 8.1 mcg of vitamin K, roughly 7% of the daily value. 

2. Polyphenols and Antioxidants While olive oil may not be rich in a broad spectrum of vitamins and minerals, it does contain various polyphenols and other antioxidants, which are associated with many of its health benefits: • Oleocanthal: A phenolic compound with anti-inflammatory properties, oleocanthal is known to mimic the effects of ibuprofen and has been linked to reduced inflammation and potential neuroprotective effects. • Hydroxytyrosol: This powerful antioxidant helps neutralize free radicals and is thought to protect against oxidative stress, which is a factor in aging and many chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer’s. • Oleuropein: Another antioxidant found in olive oil, particularly in its unprocessed forms, oleuropein is linked to cardiovascular and metabolic health benefits. 

3. Phytosterols Olive oil contains phytosterols, plant compounds that resemble cholesterol but can help block its absorption in the digestive tract, potentially lowering cholesterol levels in the blood. However, the levels are relatively low compared to other plant oils like canola oil. 

4. Fatty Acids Though not classified as vitamins or minerals, the monounsaturated fats (primarily oleic acid) in olive oil play a crucial role in its health benefits. These fats: • Promote heart health by lowering LDL cholesterol and raising HDL cholesterol. • Help reduce inflammation and improve endothelial function (the lining of blood vessels). These fats are the primary reason olive oil is linked to reduced cardiovascular risk, even though they are “just fats” in a technical sense. 

5. Trace Minerals Olive oil contains very low levels of trace minerals such as iron, calcium, and potassium, but these amounts are negligible and don’t contribute significantly to daily intake. 

Conclusion: Olive oil doesn’t provide a wide range of essential nutrients like vitamins and minerals in high quantities, aside from vitamin E and vitamin K. Its health-promoting properties are largely attributed to its monounsaturated fats and polyphenols rather than a broad nutrient profile. In essence, olive oil is valued more for its specific bioactive compounds (like antioxidants and healthy fats) rather than for being nutrient-dense like whole plant foods. In your view, olive oil may indeed be considered an “empty calorie” food in the sense that it lacks a wide array of nutrients beyond fats and a few specific antioxidants. Whole olives, by contrast, would offer a broader nutrient profile with fiber, more vitamins, and minerals.

me: Agreed a switch from the bad fats of highly processed seed oils is good if one “has to have” empty calories.

Yes, exactly. If someone feels they need or want to use oils, then switching from highly processed seed oils (like soybean or corn oil) to something like extra virgin olive oil, which contains healthier fats and some beneficial compounds like polyphenols, is a better choice. 

However, from a nutrient-density standpoint, sticking to whole foods like nuts, seeds, avocados, or even whole olives would provide more complete nutrition, including fiber and a broader spectrum of vitamins and minerals. Olive oil is better in comparison to refined oils but still not as nutrient-rich as whole food alternatives. If minimizing empty calories is the goal, prioritizing whole, unprocessed foods makes the most sense.

End of debate.

The goal is always minimizing empty calories, if the goal is to live a long healthy life. And of course it obviously is.

Arguing any substance is "healthy" because it has two vitamins vs the broad spectrum found in whole foods is silly.

Not to mention polyphenols are abundant in whole fruits and vegetables.

So! Do not waste your calorie allotment (that level which keeps us in vibrant health) on empty ones. Calories in oils add up more quickly than is generally realized. Oils in the diet are pernicious. Why? They are "invisible"...they have no taste, and we are therefore unaware of how many empty calories we are consuming. But we are not being told this by those responsible for the dissemination of good health information. It's almost as if they enjoy their profits more than they value the health of their fellow humans.

And the combination of the addictive additives of concentrated salt and sugar, the ingredients of hyper-palatability, combined with the stealth calories in oils, are the primary cause of the obesity epidemic.

We consume an SOS free (no sugar, oil, or salt) whole foods diet because it keeps us lean, energetic, and strong.

Saturday, October 5, 2024

Book: Incurable Us - An MD warning of the corruption of Big Pharma

I am sure in favor of the quiet revolution MDs have begun to mount against big pharma's corruption. It is is quiet in the sense the numbers of MDs "in revolt" relative to the total are still quite small, but as that courageous number grows the silent majority becomes increasingly aware business as usual in health care, and pharma in particular, has become so egregiously corrupt as to be no longer be conscionable.

All of the below from the Amazon page:

https://www.amazon.com/Incurable-Me-Research-Clinical-Practice/dp/1510774947?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email




In the new book Incurable US by KP Stoller MD, transparency is brought to some of medicine’s most closely guarded secrets. As he establishes a link between commerce and medical research, K. P. Stoller also explains how to treat some of the most worrisome diseases and conditions afflicting humans today—including Lyme disease, brain trauma, dementia, and autism.

Dr. Stoller maintains that the best evidence in medical research is not incorporated into clinical practice unless the medical cartel has the potential to make large amounts of money promoting the results of the research. Stoller takes his provocative argument a step further, maintaining that if specific research conflicts with a powerful entity’s financial interests, the likely result will be an effort to suppress or distort the results. Stoller cites numerous examples, including corporate influence on GMO labeling and public health.

Stoller also explores how “revolving-door-employment” between the Centers for Disease Control and large pharmaceutical companies can affect research results—as well as our health. Written in an accessible style, 
Incurable Me is a must-read for anyone interested in the state of modern medicine.