2013 NIH paper - Institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals and the myth of safe and effective drugs; and The Fourth Turning

The 2013 paper at the link below was submitted for publication by the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. It paints a gloomy picture of increasing corruption in the pharmaceutical industry, and the authors offer suggestions that would serve to reverse this trend of drugs that are both more dangerous and less efficacious.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24088149/

Separating the funding of clinical trials from their conduct, analysis, and publication.

Independent FDA leadership.

Full public funding for all FDA activities.

Measures to discourage R&D on drugs with few, if any, new clinical benefits.

The creation of a National Drug Safety Board.

Quotes from the paper's abstract:

Over the past 35 years, patients have suffered from a largely hidden epidemic of side effects from drugs that usually have few offsetting benefits. 

The pharmaceutical industry has corrupted the practice of medicine through its influence over what drugs are developed, how they are tested, and how medical knowledge is created.

Since 1906, heavy commercial influence has compromised congressional legislation to protect the public from unsafe drugs. 

The authorization of user fees in 1992 has turned drug companies into the FDA's prime clients, deepening the regulatory and cultural capture of the agency. 

Industry has demanded shorter average review times and, with less time to thoroughly review evidence, increased hospitalizations and deaths have resulted. 

Meeting the needs of the drug companies has taken priority over meeting the needs of patients.

Unless this corruption of regulatory intent is reversed, the situation will continue to deteriorate.

Now, in the present, obviously these suggestions were not taken, and we have arrived, again obviously, at a paroxysmal example of the problems these authors are gravely concerned with, namely the mRNA injections that were mandated, and the ensuing public hysteria pro and con resulting from that mandate.

And it seems the intransigence of the pharmaceutical industry, with its supportive legislative bodies; and the World Health Organization, a non-elected intergovernmental organization that now seeks to mandate drugs to the entire population of the world, is increasingly more rooted than ever.

This shift to genetically designed chemicals being mandated by decree from a non-elected intergovernmental organization for the world  may be a Fourth Turning phenomenon. The book "The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy", seeks to clearly identify historic socionomic cycles, and describe the characteristics and impacts of each of the four "turnings". Also known as Strauss–Howe generational theory, each of the turnings has a set of characteristics.

Quoted from this page:

https://www.shortform.com/blog/cycles-of-history/#:~:text=In%20The%20Fourth%20Turning%2C%20William,Fourth%20Turning%20is%20a%20Crisis.

Briefly, they are:

------------------------------------

The First Turning: A High

A High occurs after a period of great turmoil is resolved. During a High, a new social order is put in place. Government is strong and active, and public services are expanded. Values like individualism fall out of fashion and are replaced by more collective values. Income inequality and unemployment fall, and productivity increases. Class inequality also falls, but gender gaps increase. Children are given greater autonomy.

The Second Turning: An Awakening

An Awakening occurs when people pull away from the social order imposed during the High, resulting in a cultural revolution. People question and defy the institutions and regulations established during the High as the need for them falls out of living memory.

People also reject collective values and the ideals of duty and conformity in favor of individual rights. Government weakens, and free markets begin to overshadow public services. Violence and crime increase, as do income inequality and class divisions. Gender divisions become less strict, and child-rearing becomes more lenient.

The Third Turning: An Unraveling

 An Unraveling occurs when society embraces the new order put in place during the Awakening. Trust in government and establishments continues to decline, and people become more passionate about and extreme in their beliefs. Communities become divided over morals, and unified action becomes more difficult.

People become tribal or nationalistic and suspicious of anything that doesn’t fit their values. Individualism is at its highest, and free markets become even more favored. Violence, crime, and income inequality reach their peak. Gender divisions are even less strict, and society becomes more protective of children.

The Fourth Turning: A Crisis

A Crisis occurs when a catalyst ignites a significant change in society. The anxious, pessimistic, and pre-cataclysmic mood of the Unraveling primes people to respond in a way that creates a societal upheaval. 

In response to the panic, people begin to unite as communities to establish a new social order that demands collective sacrifice to resolve the nation’s problems. The government is appointed to implement and enforce this social order.

Violence, crime, and income inequality decrease. Gender divisions increase again. Protectiveness over children is at its highest.

The risk of national violence such as revolution, civil war, and foreign war increases. Leaders characterize foreign and political opponents as immoral and refuse to compromise, and the use of highly destructive weapons increases for the sake of decisive victories.

As a result of the Crisis, society is unrecognizably transformed. The resolution of the Crisis cements the new social order and results in an end to wars.

----------------------------------------

According to the author Neil Howe we have recently entered a 4th Turning that will be comparable in impact to the American Revolution, Civil War, Great Depression, and World War II.

Confirmed, Horrifying Scandal

The video below concerns a medical scandal that occurred 40 years ago in Great Britain, but the final analysis of what went wrong has only now just been released. The prime minister of Britain Rishi Sunak has this to say:

“A day of shame for the British state.” 

“Today’s report shows a decades-long moral failure at the heart of our national life – from the National Health Service to the Civil Service, to ministers in successive governments, at every level the people and institutions in which we place our trust failed in the most harrowing and devastating way.

 “They failed the victims and their families and they failed this country.” 

“Moral failure at the heart of our national life” in which doctors, civil servants and ministers had put reputations above patient safety. 

“On behalf of this and every government stretching back to the 1970s, I am truly sorry.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024...

Well it took 40 years for the UK to become honest with itself. Odd that this report should come out during a scandal thousands of times bigger, and global. Does the scale in the current case indicate the truth will be allowed to surface sooner, later, or not at all?

Is Prime Minister Sunak tacitly drawing a parallel for taking part in Great Britain's current great cover up, and tacitly apologizing to his constituents? Under the circumstances a complete coincidence seems unlikely. Meanwhile politicians say what they are obliged to say, and we shouldn't be too surprised.

Nor should we continue to be surprised that the 3rd leading cause of death in the US is medical accidents. Or that for a few years running is probably the 1st leading cause.

The scale of deaths and suffering is truly off the chart.

Dr John Campbell's commentary is, as usual, brilliant:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WhCu3CSu3o&t=903s

Additional aspects of the pandemic that have become increasingly obvious

NIH and BigP are essentially two aspects of one body. That this body has become so incredibly corrupt is appalling.

Were these men acting in good faith and with good intentions? In their minds, perhaps. 

Or perhaps they were in such a state of panic that their involvement in gain of function research, and the lab leak that they had already surmised was responsible for the pandemic, would be made public, and their careers and reputations destroyed.

Public developments appear to be headed toward the latter outcome. Powerful forces with a lot of wealth continue to protect them however.

The expression the path to hell is paved with good intentions comes to mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAS8lJ_66B4

Appalling vaccine injury

The life of this incredibly strong mother of two has been irreparably damaged, and her situation is appalling. Information about severe vaccine injuries continues to be suppressed, and that in itself is appalling. We are not to be blamed for not knowing more about this situation affecting so many people, the powers that be are however responsible for us not knowing about it.

Her story is difficult to hear, but it should be heard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=re2rTfCWuVg&t=441s

Harvard study shows mRNA vaccines are associated with cerebral ischemia

A study out of Harvard shows mRNA "vaccines" are associated with cerebral ischemia in one case:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37064937/

It's a sad fact many serious injuries and deaths were caused by the genetic modifications we are still being told are vaccines. This will probably be written by history as the biggest medical mistake in history with all western governments (with a few exceptions) roped into it. 

This should also be written by history as a first (and huge) failed experiment of the modification of the human genome. 

Wait for it... it's gonna be awhile. The narrative now is that artificial intelligence will do a better job of genetic manipulation than human scientists, and we are at the dawn of an amazing new era in medicine and health, where all diseases will be healed quickly and completely by AI created genetic modifications.

There may be a slight problem in this narrative in that the origin cause of most of these diseases is not genetic, it's the slow acting poisons we've been convinced by giant corporations are food.

And how is an ongoing poisoning treated? First by the identification of it, and then stopping the source of it. No other treatment modality will be effective if the poisoning is not identified and stopped. And then the body's repair/healing processes will heal the damage to the extent possible.

Will Pharma identify toxic food like substances as the source of poison for the majority of the chronic diseases they seek to treat with genetic modifications? Ummm...this is how they make their trillions, don't hold your breath.

An interesting question: to what extent can medical interventions heal the body if the body's self healing mechanisms have stopped working? The answer is zero, at that point the body is dead.

Can medical/surgical interventions amplify the body's self healing mechanisms? Surgery certainly can, life threatening injuries can frequently be repaired to the point of functioning. Pharmacology is much more of a mixed bag, many of these products actually hinder the self healing mechanisms significantly when compared to a simple change of diet (removal of the poisons). And yet pharmacology gets all the attention, dozens of ads hit the screens everyday for pharma's most recent concoctions.

To some extent, perhaps to a large extent, profiteers do not care if a narrative is true, as long as it meets their needs for profit.

I'm old enough to remember when doctors used to say "food doesn't matter" when discussing chronic diseases, and "take this drug for the rest of your life" (they still say that one). That was before "chronic diseases" was a common term, but they already existed, and the tsunami was gaining speed...

Well we've learned since then that "food" that is actually poison is only going to make us sick, and "side effects" pharmaceuticals piled on top only will only make us sicker.

No worries! Artificial intelligence piled on top of artificial foods served up by mis-educated docs will make us well, for sure.

Magic in a bottle, the American Dream.

It's only a slight stretch to say we are being killed slowly and painfully for profit. Slight only because we've believed for decades technology can (and will) fix everything.

But tech is a double edged sword. Unfortunately we do not generally realize this. To that extent tech is magic and mythology.

The unfortunates killed by this mythology generate huge revenues for BigP, the general knowledge of this would be a hugely inconvenient truth for the most profitable industry in history.

What can we do about it? You can do a lot about it, it's your choice, free to make. Stop consuming toxic food-like substances engineered to be addictive (hyper-palatable), which can reduce your "need" for pharmaceuticals greatly.

Yes, it can be difficult to kick addictions to hyper-palatable substances. How difficult or relatively easy will depend greatly on your mindset.

The Pharma Fiasco and the dark side of the food industry

It started with the technological invention of artificial mother's milk. There's an expression, food is love, and the combination of "baby formula" and no direct connection to mother's breast, baby's instinctual source of life, was the negation of food is love.

In my opinion this was a significant part of the cause of the many oral addictions and chronic diseases most boomers have suffered, shortening "high energy life" span by decades.

Then we were set up for the old one-two knockout punch: in the same period processed foods were becoming the norm.

And that knockout punch was the transition to addictive (hyper-palatable) toxic food-like substances. Trix for kids? Yep.

As people got sicker pharma and big food grew like the weeds they are.

And we fell for it. Our family doctors fell for it! They were educated in the pharma fiasco narratives.

A very few of them have pulled their heads out, and have fully awakened, which is very refreshing. (Heads buried you know where are definitely not refreshing.)

Here is a sterling example in this conversation of the awakened between Dr Mark Hyman and Dr Casey Means. Oh, if we could all have family physicians this enlightened.

The title of this conversation is 

"This Is Decreasing Our Lifespan!" - Dark Side of Food Industry Nobody Talks About

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sqP3nhXw24

The Jig Is Up: It’s Time for Accountability for the Origin of COVID-19

This blog's title refers to a piece appearing on a substack called The Disinformation Chronicle at the link below:

https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/the-jig-is-up-its-time-for-accountability?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

It is not too surprising bio-weapon research by the defense community continues unabated. Or that Defense Department weapons development is conducted in secret.

Not mentioned in the above piece however is the smarmy overlap of secret weapon development and the pharma industry that pushes well past ethical boundaries. There will exist an unconscious wish (in the pharma industry) for bio-weapon accidents creating pandemics, and leading to even greater pharma profit and political power.

It is now clear there was no shred of visible compunction in the NIH gang about profiting on a pandemic they were in some part responsible for creating. This makes the Robber Baron era pale in comparison.

I suppose this sort of collective behavior is to be expected if we can view the Neil Howe and Strauss "Forth Turning" as useful perspective. According to the book this current 4th turning (we have only just entered recently according to Howe) will be comparable to the American Revolution, Civil War, Great Depression, and World War II. 

That's all pretty big stuff. I can't help but wonder if the collapse of the American Empire should be added to the list.

A brilliant analysis of a new cohort study of 99 million individuals and Covid-19 vaccine harms

Vinay Prasad MD MPH covers the bases quickly and expertly. Well worth a listen for those interested in the ongoing development of what independent studies are showing.

 (And BTW studies produced by the entities that stand to benefit should be against the law, and if they are not should at least be ignored.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3dxOzpQXYg

John Campbell - Amputation

Dr Campbell has been using simple titles for his videos recently. In this video he talks to a victim who developed  thrombocytopenia after one injection of the AstraZeneca mRNA technology and had to have one of his legs removed.

Every medical professional working on his case from surgeon down recognized very quickly the thrombocytopenia was caused by the mRNA injection, meanwhile the victim had to wait 4 years for compensation, and almost lost his house.

Dr Campbell has mentioned several times the UK government has sent all the UK mRNA injury data to the relevant pharmaceutical companies but will not release it to independent expert scientists for analysis. 

This is very telling:

1) the UK government is more concerned with protecting an industry than it's population, and is in effect currently in a fraudulent collaboration with this industry.

2) individual politicians are most probably in shock that the BigP narrative was a complete fabrication based on completely inadequate premptoray trials, ashamed about their roles in this scandal, and are now engaged in a cover-up. So far this is very nearly ALL British politicians.

3) making the scale of this scandal historical, and unique.

4) the bottom line implication is the democracies we have become accustomed to and reliant upon are currently in a radical devolution, one we can only hope does not continue.

And Dr Campbell's conversation with the injured gentleman:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiXvM9Lppkk

mRNA "vaccines" are actually GMOs

 

Many people were wondering if the novel mRNA technologies were GMOs, and were assured they were not, and were safe in every regard. It turns out this is apparently not the case: an Australian attorney has brought suit against the government, his story is told in the video below: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xW6tdQFUZUU

Encouraging movement

Again, a balanced and informed brief video from Dr John Campbell. This man has been an angel. For those not familiar he has written a brief bio:

"I am a retired Nurse Teacher and A and E nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally."

He has also written two books for nursing students on physiology and pathophysiology, available as free downloads here:

https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/generate.php?DRJOHNCAMPBELLEBOOK

And the video with Dr Campbell on the topic of a recent New York Times article titled "Thousands Believe Covid Vaccines Harmed Them. Is anyone Listening?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boqKzpftNSI&t=4s

I am going to editorialize briefly. I have never been anti vaxx, and have never resisted getting a vaccine. However as I aged and looked at statistical likelihoods re various diseases I realized odds of contraction were generally low, and I stopped bothering with vaccines unless required for travel. 

In the early stage of the pandemic, I believed the narratives we were fed via mass media, got the first mRNA jab and was sick for 6 weeks. Nothing too dramatic, a condition called pityriasis rosea, manifesting as welts and small puss pimples all over my torso, with a significant level of fatigue. Before the mRNA rollout pityriasis rosea was "very rare", and "cause unknown", but a few years later were "quite common", and an "autoimmune condition".

Interesting.

I've never had a previous vaccine reaction beyond sore arm and slight fever for a day or two.

I also had become a health nut decades prior to the pandemic as a result of the diagnosis of advanced cardiovascular disease, being told by two different cardiologists I was a candidate for heart attack "any day now". My normal weight is 150 lbs, at that point I was about 210, and was having every symptom of advanced heart disease, some I had never heard of. There is something like 10 different symptoms, and I was experiencing all of them.

The good news is with diet, exercise, and mindfulness study I regained robust health over a period of a few years. Then eight years ago when I was signing up for medicare I was asked several questions by more than one interviewer: "what medications do you take". "None"....pause.... "are you sure?"

Since that time I have been asked this question many times, the answer remains "none", and there is always a reaction similar to the above. It's as if the vast majority of our population does not realize "lifetime" pharmaceuticals are not only not necessary, but the actual logistics of disease reversal are really quite simple.

It begins with "do not put anything in your body that is not real food". Using the word "real" because apparently most do not realize we are so sick in this country primarily because we are not eating real food.

And fortunately, I was already plugged into a vast network of health nuts, vocational and avocational alike, and the conversations in that universe were increasingly about a proportionally large number of mRNA injuries. How large? The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system (VARES) was collecting numbers of injuries with temporal correlation to the jabs that was off the scale compared with any other vaccine in history.

As the numbers grew rapidly they surpassed all vaccines in history combined, as a ratio to numbers vaccinated.

I hesitate to use the word vaccine to describe mRNA technology at this point, because legally, if going by preexisting laws and regulations, they would be identified as genetically modified substances, which would require an entirely different approval system and would not have been called vaccines, and promoted as such. They might never have been approved as a pharmacological intervention at all in fact.

And if they ever were, would have required years of legal wrangling to get there.

Meanwhile there was, as part of the rollout narrative, that we were in an abject emergency that might kill half of global population. But in the earliest stages of the pandemic there were studies conducted by some of the most pedigreed epidemiologists on planet earth to determine actual lethality, and which found this virus was benign relative to the dire prognostication. It can also be said the health care system itself, guided by BigP, refused to do common sense measures like early treatment. Thus the numbers that did occur were "jacked", according to many doctors and nurses. 

Surely that was not intentional! Why? Because if so it would have risen to the level of "crime against humanity"... and surely we have not fallen to such an abject level of extreme greed to do such a thing.

Meanwhile, some were given early treatment in the form of "antiviral cocktails" regardless of Big P's commands, and typically recovered quickly if caught in the early stages. The most well known case is Trump, who entered hospital pretty sick already, with the cards stacked against his recovery...old and overweight. He was treated with an antiviral cocktail and left the hospital 3 days later.

And the emergency use authorization for mRNA injections could not have occurred if there existed a pre-existing effective treatment.

So why were BigP and the captured regulatory agencies so insistent on bending the rules?

And why wasn't the mRNA recalled, as would have been done in any previous vaccine rollout that collected a significant number of VAERS reports, not to mention all previous VAERS reports were  tiny compared to the mRNA?

I think there are two reasons:

1) The pharma industry has become the most politically powerful single industry in history, and gets what it wants, and what it wants is power and extreme profit.

2) Cracking the genetic code (the human genome) is considered by many the single most important scientific breakthrough in history, and with this knowledge all disease, and perhaps aging itself, will be cured. 

No matter whatever kind of crap we put in our bodies.

Personally I feel messing around with the genome is going to blow up in our collective face. And this conclusion does not require a religious belief, it only requires a recognition of the biological complexity that is earth we will likely never understand completely.

In a similar vein, looking outward (the universe), as opposed to inward (biology), the idea the human species will conquer space travel to the extent we can populate Mars (etc Ad infinitum) because we have "used up" Earth is massively stupid. Pretty much the same stupid as thinking we will completely understand biology.

Creativity and destructivity are both nested in the unconsciousness. We humans are capable of great creativity and equally great destructivity. The unconscious denial of the destructive potential part of this equation can get us "killed"... let's not do that.

Greed overrides common sense however, and this is where much of the denial of the obvious comes from.

All of which is inconvenient for the pharma industry, not to mention the deeply indebted US government so dependent on the revenues generated by pharma and the health care system, which are larger than any other industry or economic sector in history.

And finally, here we have the health nuts who do not put any foreign substance in their bodies, including any medication, that is not absolutely necessary. Which means as close to never as possible. But I did, and then didn't need to be told twice to not have another genetic modification of my body, thankyouverymuch.

Oh, and BTW, we health nuts who do not put foreign substances into our bodies have always been opposed to the genetic modification of our commercial food supplies. Which is simply the precautionary principle in action, another way of saying: 

Let's use common sense, shall we?