A fascinating and informative conversation with prominent public health scientist Jay Bhattacharya. Who, I should add, is about the furthest thing from "discredited kook" one might imagine.
Wednesday, August 25, 2021
Thursday, August 19, 2021
The FLCCC Alliance protocol for Covid-19 (Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance)
The FLCCC Alliance protocol for Covid-19 is the thing to do if you develop symptoms you think might be Covid, and then test positive. If you think you may have developed Covid you should get tested ASAP, and if positive go to the FLCCC Alliance website and learn about the protocol. Time is of the essence at that point, the earlier you begin treatment the higher the odds of a fast and full recovery. The treatment is something like 85% effective when done in the early stages of Covid.
That's why this protocol is also known as the early treatment protocol. It consists of one prescription drug and four nutraceuticals (vitamins and minerals).
FLCCC Alliance website
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
And the download link to the protocol page
https://phibetaiota.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/COVID-Protocol.pdf
The rapid recovery is remarkable considering people all over the world in great numbers have recovered quickly. Ivermectin, the prescription drug in the protocol is inexpensive, widely available, and has one of the best safety profiles of any drug in history - it's been in use for 4 or 5 decades, and has been prescribed billions of times for a variety of conditions, and was awarded a Noble Prize.
Well it does have one problem...it's off patent, therefore Big P can't make a dime on it. Therefore it is not widely promoted, and you may have heard bad things about it. Look into it, the efficacy is remarkable, as is it's safety.
And here is one of the doctors who has been leading the charge on the Early Treatment protocol, explaining why early treatment for Covid is so necessary, Dr. Peter McCullough.
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
How safe is Ivermectin relative to the mRNA vaccines?
I'd like to make a comment on my blog posts relating to the pandemic. I likely would not have come across the many public health scientists and medical doctors speaking out on this topic if a) I really didn't watch much TV, b) if I weren't intensely interested in health issues, and c) online many hours a week reading studies and following the doctors who's approach to medicine is to treat chronic disease with diet, and in the process getting patients off medications and back to full vibrant health again.
But I have come across this information, and it's become extremely obvious to me that this many experts wouldn't be speaking out if there wasn't something obviously very wrong in this situation.
Here again we have credentialed public health scientists in discussion "off-line" on the safety and merits of Ivermectin vs the mRNA vaccines. This discussion is hosted on a video platform called Odysee that apparently does not follow the censorship guidelines.
https://odysee.com/@DarkHorsePodcastClips:b/Ivermectin-evidence-being-ignored:5
Sunday, August 15, 2021
Why Are Fruits Good for Diabetes | Mastering Diabetes with Cyrus Khambatta
If you read my last blog post featuring Dr. McCullough you'll know I feel strongly it's past time to unmask the big pharma bandit, and reveal him for what he is. To do that more of us have to be aware of the true character of this industry. It may be hard to believe, but it's possible and even easy to reverse the many chronic diseases widely thought to be incurable that big pharma generates huge profits by "treating" with prescription drugs. Whether we pay for them out of our pocket, or Medicare funnels to loot directly to big pharma, the result is the same: Big P is one of the most profitable industries in history. They can afford massive propaganda campaigns to keep us unaware and dependent for life. Big P literally has a vested interest in an unhealthy population. There's something very wrong with this situation.
Now let me introduce another courageous individual, Dr. Cyrus Khambatta, who can show us that type 2 diabetes is quickly, easily, and completely CURED with a healthy diet. If some of this information seems impossible, even ridiculous, to you, consider this is only because of the massive propaganda campaigns mounted by the very wealthy and powerful pharmacology industry.
‘It must be part of a master plan’: COVID drugs banned despite efficacy
There's something very wrong with a "health care" system where medical industry profits are put before public health. I've been talking about the corruption of big pharma from time to time since I began this blog. I've quoted the famous American writer Upton Sinclair in this regard many times, here goes again: "It difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it".
This quote is the most generous way possible to understand why this behavior occurs. The inference is well intentioned folks succumb to unconscious bias unknowingly. They believe so strongly they are doing the right thing they are completely unaware their collective behavior is basically unethical, immoral, and possibly even illegal. But one does have to wonder: is the entire industry completely unaware of this? That, friends, would be an impossibility.
Which brings us to the topic of this particular blog post, Dr. Peter McCullough, a medical industry veteran who in addition to being in private practice also happens to be one of the more published medical research scientists of this time. In addition to research he has also personally chaired more drug safety review boards than almost anyone working today. His CV is a mile long...and unassailable.
He is in fact arguably the most qualified doctor today to have led the public response to the pandemic, but his voice has been censored from public airwaves, and instead we have doctors leading the charge who are imbedded with big pharma, and who have never personally treated covid patients themselves.
So we have to wonder - how unaware is the medical industry as a whole that profits have been put before public health, and even before lives?
Dr. McCullough is a very courageous individual indeed to be speaking out about how the pandemic was (and is) being handled. Why would he do this, going against standard of practices as recommended by the Big P controlled medical establishment? Are you familiar with the term "a bridge too far?" Perhaps Big P has become egregiously hubristic at this juncture by ordering doctors not do do early treatment, and punishing those that do. All the while knowing early treatment would have kept covid patients out of hospitals, and preventing up to 80% of the death rate that has occurred in many countries.
But McCullough is not the only doctor who is speaking out against this travesty, there are many others who advocate and use EARLY TREATMENT with their covid patients. Some of these ethical and courageous docs have lost their medical licenses to practice, in a few countries have even been jailed.
I'm no fan of trump, but I have to mention him in this context to illustrate a point. When he was sick with covid many (including me) were shocked at how rapidly he recovered. Some of my friends thought the whole thing had to have been faked for some kind of political advantage. Actually the only thing that happened was trump got early treatment with a cocktail of off patent drugs that were known to reverse covid rapidly and effectively. So obviously SOME DOCTORS KNEW the safety and efficacy of early treatment with INEXPENSIVE and WIDELY AVAILABLE drugs.
Draw your own conclusions.
Here is Dr. McCullough:
Saturday, August 14, 2021
Dr. Drew on the Dangers of Covid Hysteria
I would prefer to put the politicization of the pandemic to the side, but it's difficult with so many thinking of it primarily as a political situation. Well that may be because the response was political, not medical, as Dr. Drew discusses in this interview.
It was politically easy to manipulate media into inducing panic responses in the population, because the all-inclusive dangers to total populations were overblown by those that stood to benefit. In other words Big P, who "owns" congress and the media.
I'm noticing more and more doctors are coming out about how insensitive and even inhumane the lockdown response was. But every time I look at main stream media I see they are still on board with the censorship of the actual science, the pre-existing body of public health science (epidemiologic) literature going back decades.
These doctors who are speaking out are still censored in the sense they are not allowed to express their views on mainstream media, so most of us remain unaware of how large a body of opinion this is. And it bears repeating, this is not political, it's medical, these doctors are democrats and republicans. Nor are they antivaxxers, the vast majority of them have always gotten vaccinated.
So where are they speaking out if not on TV? Podcasts and other internet media outlets. Many of them have been speaking out from early on in the pandemic. I only know about them because of my interest in health issues (and I basically stopped watching TV in my teen years).
These courageous doctors have been characterized in mainstream media as a few discredited kooks. Nothing could be further from the truth. Among their ranks are some of the most credentialed public health scientists in the world. I am hoping against hope we do not turn into China, where all media (including internet) is censored.
BTW I looked up Megan Kelly since I am unfamiliar with her (Dr. Drew was on her podcast), she is politically a registered independent who was mostly critical of Trump. Independent is a good vantage point from which to view this:
Tuesday, August 10, 2021
Humans are frugivores?!
Who says humans are frugivores?
These people do!
I've always wondered why I feel best when eating copious amounts of fruit every day...
Friday, August 6, 2021
Thursday, August 5, 2021
Is there an inexpensive off label drug as effective as the mRNA vaccines?
And if there is, what are the implications of this?
An "off-label" drug is one that is effective for other purposes than the one the FDA has formally approved of. Practising physicians frequently use off label drugs that have been shown over the years to be effective for a variety of conditions.
These drugs are also frequently beyond the years protected by patents, and are cheap, and widely available. In this particular instance there is an off-patent off-label drug that has been shown to be extremely safe in widespread use around the globe, that was also awarded a Nobel Prize for medicine when introduced some 4 decades ago.
This drug has more recently been shown to be highly effective in the prevention and treatment of Covid-19. There are now some 600 studies from around the world showing this. However, for some reason, information about this has been censored from public media.
The conversation linked below is between two scientists looking at the implications of suppressing an inexpensive and effective alternative to the emergency use mRNA vaccines.
Before we get to that however, another very highly regarded public health scientist and practising physician featured a few times in this blog previously, Dr. Peter McCullough, has said early treatment with this drug in question, in the context of a drug and nutraceutical "cocktail" approach, could have prevented 85% of the mortality of Covid-19. If that is correct 600,000 deaths in the US could have been 90,000.
And that raises a very disturbing question: would an entire industry, in conjunction with government, have blocked an efficient and effective alternative to the prevention and treatment of Covid-19? It's almost unthinkable that could be the case.
It would have required massive censorship to accomplish. Could that have been the reason we've had all this censorship, with doctors losing their license to practise? The evidence for it does seem to be piling up.
Here's that conversation:
Tuesday, August 3, 2021
Dr. Graham Reacts: Is VARIETY Really That Important?
There are various ways an exclusively raw exclusively vegan diet can go. The only one of them that works long term (to the best of my knowledge) is laid out in Dr. Graham's book The 80/10/10 Diet.
Why should we care about an exclusively raw exclusively vegan diet if only one way of doing it actually works? Because the more we can incorporate "cause of health" behaviors into our lives the better we feel, the more energy we have, the more apt we are to "automagically" go to our own ideal weight and stay there, and certainly not least, the more apt we are to reverse any and all negative health conditions and chronic diseases.
Doug Graham talks about "the cause of health" all the time. His web site "FoodNSport.com" in fact has the subtitle "defining the cause of health". And if you think about it, focusing on the cause of health (as opposed to the cause of disease) is a MUCH more functional way to live.
I'm not here to say there's only one way of doing things that work. We all have to follow our own "star". Most of us will not become exclusively raw and exclusively vegan. But the point of view of those that follow that path for decades while achieving very high levels of health, and even very high levels of athleticism, can be quite instructive.
Some common sense from Dr. Graham, in a 6 minute video:
Inventor of the mRNA vaccine talks censorship
Dr Robert Malone is frequently given credit for inventing the mRNA vaccine. Apparently some object because he didn't play a significant role in bringing the Moderna and Pfizer versions to fruition. But isn't the bearer of the original idea the "inventor", and those bringing it to fruition the "developers"?
At any rate Dr. Malone is a long standing vaccinologist with impeccable credentials and ties to the NIH, FDA, and CDC. Let's hear what he has to say about the censorship that he and many of his distinguished colleagues have been experiencing simply for doing what scientists do:
Dr Mercola is taking all his content offline
In this troubling video Dr Mercola explains why he feels forced to remove all his content. To be clear, I don't follow Dr Mercola's work, but I have read enough of him to understand his approach and biases, and I am basically in a different "camp". However, while I do not find his approach optimal, it is FAR better than the standard American diet, and I'm all in favor of any modality that induces significant improvement in health that people can wrap their heads around and execute on. And of course he may be correct and I may be wrong.
I hate to say it, but I have to agree with him that this is a sad, dark, and dangerous period we are entering in the history of the US. A marked shift toward loss of liberty began with 9-11, an event caused at least in some part by our domination of the globe, and the loss of liberty has accelerated exponentially since the beginning of the pandemic.
I've been wondering since the internet arrived how long we would be able to enjoy this amazing resource. People would say "but it's so full of crap". My response was always, "true, so don't read that stuff".
It is not in human nature to give up power even to prevent war. We're in a cycle that has occurred many hundreds of time since humans became civilized. In this sense we are no different than most of the other life forms on the planet, and "higher intelligence" has been no antidote.